|
|
|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=20160 |
|
| Comments: 154 (Read/Post) Favorites: 1 (View) |
Submitted
on: 03-11-2003
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Photoshop/Art |
Photoshop of: 18104
Photoshops of this image:
31245, |
Description:
Tried putting my car on the wheels I want to get for it this summer, (ROH Snypers) and tinted it. I will probably drop it about 2 inches too. What do you guys think? |
Showing page: 4 of 8
[ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ]
 |
| #61 |
3-12-2003 @ 03:37:10 PM |
Posted By : DiRF  |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#51, Civics are alright. Economical, [relatively] cheap, decent [but not good] looking. I just don't like that fact that some people think that an engine that has variable valve technology makes it a racecar, and if not that, they add snowplow/guppy bumpers, erector set park benches on the decklid, and stickers galore...ick. I would say Civics have good build-quality, but, from my experience, they DON'T. Even Car and Driver said the newest Civics they've tested have below-Korean-level quality...
|
|
| #62 |
3-12-2003 @ 03:38:00 PM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
should i post the "arguing on the internet is like the retarded olympics" image?
|
|
| #63 |
3-12-2003 @ 03:38:20 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#51, No, I fit into the "prefers cars that drive from the right end" category. And, putting things in their proper context, if you had a choice between a Volvo of this age and a Civic of the same vintage, which would you choose? Reliable as Civics from that time might have been, their numbers are steadily decreasing.
|
|
| #64 |
3-12-2003 @ 03:39:00 PM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#60, Stay on topic, we're discussing Volvos vs. Civics. You started the argument, now stay and discuss it, don't be a troll and change the subject.
|
|
| #65 |
3-12-2003 @ 03:39:54 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#60, Yes, and "bodykit that looks like crap" always equals rice. Guess what we have a lot of pictures of Civic with?
And there have been some tasteful import cars posted on here in the past, and the majority of the regulars on here have acknowledged that they're pretty good.
|
|
| #66 |
3-12-2003 @ 03:39:56 PM |
| Posted By : Bling24 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#63 as much as I like stock hondas i wish they were RWD
|
|
| #67 |
3-12-2003 @ 03:40:28 PM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#61, They don't have good build quality from my experience either. Cheap components, plenty of squeaks and interior noises, etc.
|
|
| #68 |
3-12-2003 @ 03:41:10 PM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#66, RWD with at least a V6 or V8. It would be rather dumb to have a RWD car with a 1.6L, 90-110 HP engine.
|
|
| #69 |
3-12-2003 @ 03:43:02 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#68, Depends on weight. What do you think a Lotus Elise is?
|
|
| #71 |
3-12-2003 @ 03:43:14 PM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#61 i tend to disagree, the older-style civic si's looks very nice, in my opinion
|
|
| #72 |
3-12-2003 @ 03:43:45 PM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Oh yeah, and no Torque.
The Elise has a lot more than 90HP too, doesn't it?
|
|
| #75 |
3-12-2003 @ 03:44:27 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#72, No, it has around 120 or so. It's no powerhouse, it just happens to weigh ~1600 lbs.
|
|
| #77 |
3-12-2003 @ 03:45:31 PM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Ok...how's this setup. A 2400lb car with RWD, 90HP, about 85 ft-lbs...
Sounds pretty sluggish to me.
|
|
| #79 |
3-12-2003 @ 03:45:46 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#71, You mean the coupe-bodied ones? Yeah, those look kinda sporty..
|
Showing page: 4 of 8
[ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
