|
|
|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=20160 |
|
| Comments: 154 (Read/Post) Favorites: 1 (View) |
Submitted
on: 03-11-2003
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Photoshop/Art |
Photoshop of: 18104
Photoshops of this image:
31245, |
Description:
Tried putting my car on the wheels I want to get for it this summer, (ROH Snypers) and tinted it. I will probably drop it about 2 inches too. What do you guys think? |
Showing page: 7 of 8
[ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ]
 |
| #128 |
3-12-2003 @ 04:38:32 PM |
| Posted By : Obsidian |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#127, "but fwd cars can handle soooooo much bedar!!!!"
funny how they mistake understeer for good handleing.
|
|
| #129 |
3-12-2003 @ 04:38:51 PM |
| Posted By : solid_snake |
Reply | Edit | Del |
what I don't understand is why he was compairing a 84 volvo to a new civic
|
|
| #131 |
3-12-2003 @ 04:40:53 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
and why he keeps putting this car down. i mean damn, for an 84 it looks damn good
|
|
| #134 |
3-12-2003 @ 06:38:18 PM |
| Posted By : Special K |
Reply | Edit | Del |
You people seem to love to put words in my mouth, I was speaking about civics in general. Im not ripping biohazard for modifying his crap box, I WAS MERELY MAKING AN OBSERVATION ABOUT HOW HIPOCRITICAL SOME PEOPLE ARE ON THIS SITE. and #125 and #127, if you would take any rwd car over a civic just because its rwd, then you have your priorities way out of whack.
|
|
| #135 |
3-12-2003 @ 06:49:04 PM |
| Posted By : Obsidian |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#134, i don't think so!
do you even know the what capibilites rear-wheel drive has over front wheel drive?
if that is hard to answer - then why are all the high end sports cars rear wheel drive?
[Edited by Obsidian on 3-12-2003 @ 06:49:21 PM]
|
|
| #136 |
3-12-2003 @ 07:03:56 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#134, yes i would take ANY car thats RWD over a civic, cause FWD<RWD<=AWD. AWD is better but not as much fun at times. plus i would never own a civic anyhow cause i dont like entry level econboxes
|
|
| #137 |
3-12-2003 @ 07:05:45 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
the only thing FWD doesn't suck at is driving in the snow. it understeers, and if you ever get to where your making anykind of low end torque you get torqu steer
|
|
| #138 |
3-12-2003 @ 07:09:45 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#134, and yes you do seem to be ripping him for modiflying his car. snice for what ever reason you think this car is crap. granted volvos aren't everyones cup of tea, but this car looks nice and is in good shape for being an 83. it is by no means crap
|
|
| #139 |
3-12-2003 @ 07:12:26 PM |
| Posted By : solid_snake |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I've said before I find it easier to drive RWD in snow than FWD
|
|
| #140 |
3-12-2003 @ 07:15:27 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#139, yes put a RWD car has a higher chance at getting stuck then a FWD. which is what i ment by posting that. i too have no problem driving in the snow in a RWD
|
Showing page: 7 of 8
[ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
