|
|
|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=20160 |
|
| Comments: 154 (Read/Post) Favorites: 1 (View) |
Submitted
on: 03-11-2003
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Photoshop/Art |
Photoshop of: 18104
Photoshops of this image:
31245, |
Description:
Tried putting my car on the wheels I want to get for it this summer, (ROH Snypers) and tinted it. I will probably drop it about 2 inches too. What do you guys think? |
Showing page: 3 of 8
[ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ]
 |
| #41 |
3-12-2003 @ 03:25:26 PM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#37, I've seen Civics that are very well done, but they've spent more on making the car look good and less economical than is really worth it. If they have nice 15" or 16" rims with some nice tires, no fartpipes or wings or aletzzas, and it's tastefully done, I have no problem with it.
I'll admit I don't like many Civics, I just don't like them from the factory. I've been in them and I don't think they are good cars.
|
|
| #43 |
3-12-2003 @ 03:26:15 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#40, Volvos handle better, that's for sure. Civics are FF understeer cars. On the other hand, you'll be hard-pressed to find a better handling sedan than a Volvo 240.
|
|
| #44 |
3-12-2003 @ 03:26:18 PM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#42 - Not like a Volvo.
[Edited by mr_mcmunkee on 3-12-2003 @ 03:26:44 PM]
|
|
| #45 |
3-12-2003 @ 03:27:26 PM |
| Posted By : solid_snake |
Reply | Edit | Del |
the only thing I would call "inferior" to a civic is some other econobox, compare year to year what were 1984 hondas like?
|
|
| #46 |
3-12-2003 @ 03:27:45 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#40, They are RWD. They are known for reliablity--there's a whole production run of Volvos know for having "million mile" engines. And heck, if you don't like that, a lot of people retrofit them with Ford 302s. Some of them are available with engines that are decently powerful. Sure, their styling doesn't excite me, but is there anything besides that which would make them inferior to Civics?
|
|
| #47 |
3-12-2003 @ 03:28:36 PM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#40, FAR INFERIOR TO A CIVIC?!?!?! Civics are bottom-of-the-line economy cars...nothing is "far inferior" to them. The only cars inferior to them are Hyundai Accents, Kias, Geos, Yugos, etc.
|
|
| #49 |
3-12-2003 @ 03:30:55 PM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Ok, I like the looks of Volvos better than Civics if styling is everything.
|
|
| #50 |
3-12-2003 @ 03:30:58 PM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#46 the new ones are more than "decently" powered, the smallest/cheapest volvo, the s40, runs mid 15's
|
|
| #51 |
3-12-2003 @ 03:32:01 PM |
| Posted By : Special K |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Obviously you guys like volvos better than civics, you all fit into the biased anti-ricer category.
|
|
| #52 |
3-12-2003 @ 03:33:31 PM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
We're not biased, we just know a quality car when we see one...and we can also identify a cheap economy car as well. It sounds like YOU are the one who is biased, towards Civics.
|
|
| #53 |
3-12-2003 @ 03:34:34 PM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#51 i would rather have a 2001 civic si over a new S40, if that tells you anything...but the new si's are plain ugly
|
|
| #54 |
3-12-2003 @ 03:34:43 PM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
We never discussed RICE anyways...you just started throwing accusations and pre-judgements around. We were talking about TASTEFUL and PROPER lowering of a car and NICE wheels that are in proportion to the car.
|
|
| #55 |
3-12-2003 @ 03:34:45 PM |
| Posted By : solid_snake |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#51, because some people prefer volvos to hondas? that seems rather assinine to me
|
|
| #56 |
3-12-2003 @ 03:35:23 PM |
| Posted By : Obsidian |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#51, i bet to you that makes us racists too.
because civic's come from honda. honda is a Japanese engineering company (NOT a car company). Therefore - since we don't like the civic we are racists!
|
|
| #58 |
3-12-2003 @ 03:36:58 PM |
| Posted By : Bling24 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
the only reason I'm partly biased is b/c both my parents' cars are hondas my sister has a suburban
|
|
| #59 |
3-12-2003 @ 03:37:02 PM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I personally don't like Civics because I've been in them, I find them cheaply made and underpowered, and honestly not that attractive looking. I haven't even mentioned anything about ricing them, I don't like them from the factory.
|
|
| #60 |
3-12-2003 @ 03:37:10 PM |
| Posted By : Special K |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#54, I wasn't the only one throwing accusations and prejudgements around, just take a look at the rest of the site.
|
Showing page: 3 of 8
[ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
