Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: Fpost   By: DiRF   Comment: "Now do Classical Gas!..."
Car: 98681   By: DiRF   Comment: "This must have been right around 1979, when the US..."
Car: Fpost   By: DiRF   Comment: "Very nice...."
Car: Fpost   By: Adambomb   Comment: "So, I pre-odered these last August and they finall..."
Car: 98680   By: Skid   Comment: "Neat! I don't know if I've ever seen one of these ..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

0 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password



This image has expired.

Final Stats:

Total Votes 697
Average Score 8.34
Verdict Rice



Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=2134
Submitted by: Jiffy
Comments: 58  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 0  (View)
Submitted on: 03-19-2002
View Stats Category: Car
Description:
-=classic Ricecop=-


   Comments

Showing page: 3 of 3
[
1 2 3 ]

#41
4-13-2002 @ 01:46:31 AM
Posted By : Mad Max Reply | Edit | Del
Given the complete uselessness and stupidity of the mods we can see, I'd say it's safe to say this is pretty damn slow.

#42
4-13-2002 @ 01:49:20 AM
Posted By : CRacer25 Reply | Edit | Del
True,true.

#43
4-13-2002 @ 01:50:19 AM
Posted By : Mad Max Reply | Edit | Del
Lose the body kit, lose the stickers, lose the pipe organ sticking out the back end, put 800hp in it, and I'd drive it, even if it IS named the "Cedric."

#44
4-13-2002 @ 01:58:12 AM
Posted By : CRacer25 Reply | Edit | Del
Yea me to.For a sedan it's not bad.(not this one but you know what I mean)

#45
4-13-2002 @ 01:58:48 AM
Posted By : Mad Max Reply | Edit | Del
Well, of course. This would be pretty nice stock, or modified WELL.

#46
4-13-2002 @ 02:01:16 AM
Posted By : CRacer25 Reply | Edit | Del
That goes without saying of course.

#47
4-24-2002 @ 02:38:20 PM
Posted By : Jurrell Reply | Edit | Del
IT'S A NISSAN CEDRIC, oops, didn't read the rest of the comments.

[Edited by Jurrell on 4-24-2002 @ 02:42:46 PM]


#48
5-05-2002 @ 04:05:36 PM
Posted By : Jon Reply | Edit | Del
I'll take that, what looks like a VW in the background...

#49
5-28-2002 @ 01:35:26 PM
Posted By : chevydomestic17 Reply | Edit | Del
you ricers get more gay by the hour.

#50
7-04-2002 @ 03:07:34 AM
Posted By : no1camaro Reply | Edit | Del
well they do give u somthing to sit on.. haha POS 100% this bonehead really messed up a really nice car

#51
8-18-2002 @ 09:11:25 PM
Posted By : Jurrell Reply | Edit | Del
How can you copyright a pic of a car that isn't even yours, dah!!

#52
8-18-2002 @ 09:22:06 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
Jurrell, it's generally accepted that the copyright for a photo belongs to the person that took the photo, or the person to whom possession of the photo was transferred. In other words, I could take a photo of anything I wanted, even if I didn't own it, and the photograph would belong to me. If I wanted to get it copyrighted, I could register for a copyright and do so.

#53
8-18-2002 @ 09:22:40 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
Of course, copyright involves more than just putting "copyright YOUR NAME HERE" on a picture.

#54
10-07-2002 @ 01:37:43 AM
Posted By : Keisuke_Turbo Reply | Edit | Del
that car is ugly but nissan cedrics are really nice cars they have an rb30dett in them stock and the 280hp under rated and have power everything it is like a performance luxury sedan and the cedric super street had 450hp wit only a boost controller and an intercooler but the 900hp gloria that was in the same edition of super street was done by hiratu engineering which are a crazy japanese tuner. litlle info the cedric would be like our 5 series bmw while the gloria would be like our 7 series bmw

#55
12-05-2002 @ 10:39:43 AM
Posted By : Kakoriat Reply | Edit | Del
I want a stock Gloria please.

#56
12-12-2002 @ 08:36:14 AM
Posted By : mr_mcmunkee Reply | Edit | Del
#2, Glow tags are gay. That's why we banned them.

#57
12-12-2002 @ 08:55:41 AM
Posted By : 95T-Bird Reply | Edit | Del
thats a new level of gay

#58
3-03-2004 @ 12:52:08 PM
Posted By : Asskicker2003 Reply | Edit | Del
............

Showing page: 3 of 3
[
1 2 3 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Sunday, May 5, 2024 07:25:20 AM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.