|
|
|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=22248 |
|
| Comments: 17 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 05-02-2003
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
Photoshops of this image:
30269, |
Description:
2004 Monte Carlo SS |
Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]
 |
| #1 |
7-15-2003 @ 03:54:28 PM |
| Posted By : MaxSE |
Reply | Edit | Del |
still a measly 200 hp in these boats?
|
|
| #4 |
8-05-2003 @ 09:03:48 AM |
| Posted By : Obsidian |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Dear GM:
Dropping a SC 3.8 into the 2004 Monte Carlo will not increase sales. Why? Because the gernaral public doesn't give a rats ass about the Monte Carlo (except for the NASCAR followers).
|
|
| #6 |
8-05-2003 @ 09:42:46 AM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#1, if its the 240 it will get up in move, my moms ultra will hang with me till 80 from a rolling start
|
|
| #8 |
8-05-2003 @ 09:53:43 AM |
| Posted By : kstagger |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I'm debating if my wife needs a Buick PA Ultra (used) or something completely useless in the winter like a mustang convertible
|
|
| #9 |
8-05-2003 @ 09:56:15 AM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#8, you already have a RWD V8 so i'ld say go with the ultra
[Edited by stang392 on 8-05-2003 @ 09:59:40 AM]
|
|
| #10 |
8-05-2003 @ 09:58:38 AM |
| Posted By : kstagger |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#9, jah... I really prefer RWD. My wife loves her Mountaineer... but once I pay it off, I'll get it and buy her something else. She really doesn't need a 5.0L v8!
The Gran Marquis or Crown Vic also springs to mind... at least those are full framed.
|
|
| #11 |
8-05-2003 @ 10:01:24 AM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
i'ld still go with a used ultra, even the new vics don't have anything on the inside of the ultras
|
|
| #13 |
2-11-2004 @ 10:07:45 PM |
| Posted By : V8Tbird |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Who ever herd of an V-6 SS anyway? And it just looks slow.
|
|
| #14 |
2-11-2004 @ 10:11:38 PM |
| Posted By : Jesuz |
Reply | Edit | Del |
i sew an 80's monte SS today and it looks way better than this POS even tho the car was 1/4 a centry old
|
|
| #15 |
2-11-2004 @ 10:11:51 PM |
| Posted By : SuperDave479 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Yeah the regular SS is 200hp and is N/A. New for 2004 is the "Supercharged SS" model with 240hp (they say "Supercharged SS" on the side instead of "Monte Carlo SS". The Impala didn't have an SS for this generation until this year so those are just called "SS" and they are all supercharged. Both the MC Supercharged SS and Impala SS are only available in black. Both have ground effects standard, nice-looking exhaust tips on both sides and 17" wheels. The MC has a NASCAR-style lip spoiler and the Impala SS has a black painted back panel (instead of dark red). Still a V6 and FWD, but they are faster than the LT1 94-96 Impala SS.
[Edited by SuperDave479 on 2-11-2004 @ 10:16:39 PM]
|
|
| #16 |
2-11-2004 @ 10:14:39 PM |
| Posted By : Jesuz |
Reply | Edit | Del |
yeah that's another thing. they fucked up the impala and made them FWD
|
|
| #17 |
2-11-2004 @ 10:15:16 PM |
| Posted By : V8Tbird |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Make it a Supercharged 350 V-8 and they would sale like mad, and wouldn't be a disgrace to the SS title.
|
Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
