|
|
|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=24320 |
|
| Comments: 123 (Read/Post) Favorites: 1 (View) |
Submitted
on: 06-18-2003
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Caption Contest |
|
|
Description:
Protestors can be so incredibly stupid. Here we see a woman outside of a French government building trying to convey her point...ummm...by setting herself on fire.
WHAT'S HER POINT? |
Showing page: 2 of 7
[ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ]
 |
| #23 |
6-18-2003 @ 04:14:04 PM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#20, Oh c'mon. Clinton did NOTHING for 8 years, yet he also came out saying Saddam had the weapons. Everyone knows they are there, but Saddam has had 12 YEARS to hide or transport them. Also, people complain about us not finding weapons while fighting the war...uhhh...we were are little busy, FIGHTING A WAR. It's not so easy to fire a shot and dig the ground up looking for weapons at the same time. Saddam had years to hide them...it may take years to find them. Americans are so spoiled in the fact that they expect everything instantly, from messages to popcorn to military actions.
|
|
| #24 |
6-18-2003 @ 04:16:28 PM |
| Posted By : Asakha |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#20, LOL, true !
But yes, I agree Saddam had to go, but you don't need to destroy a whole country to get one guy down. Snipers are used for that...
|
|
| #25 |
6-18-2003 @ 04:16:32 PM |
| Posted By : fordtacomaz |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#23, Clinton "gave them a chance" to let UN inspectors inspect missle sites. then we bombed Iraq. again. that's the only thing i supported Clinton on.
[Edited by fordtacomaz on 6-18-2003 @ 04:17:14 PM]
|
|
| #27 |
6-18-2003 @ 04:17:36 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#23, We had free access to Iraq after the first war, and plenty of time to find the weapons. If they were there.
I just don't get that mentality: We've never seen them, there's no conclusive evidence for them, but we know they're there, and we have to get him before he doesn't attack us again!
|
|
| #29 |
6-18-2003 @ 04:19:38 PM |
| Posted By : Asakha |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#19, I went to US a few time, lemme say that I've been almost beaten 'cause I was french. No wonders we might not be really nice everytime...
|
|
| #30 |
6-18-2003 @ 04:20:05 PM |
| Posted By : warlock |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Just write the word "sniper" on a daisy cutter and let it loose on his palace.
|
|
| #31 |
6-18-2003 @ 04:20:42 PM |
| Posted By : fordtacomaz |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#24, we didnt destroy the whole country. you ever heard of the term "shit happens?" well shit happened. its called collateral damage. if anything their country is a better place because people can go as the please without being worried about lifting the wrong finger and being shot in the middle of the street. The thing about bringing him down with a sniper is that unfortunately its illegal to do. we cannot assassinate the head of a foreign government. im willing to bet that if it was legal...we wouldn't have to worry about Korea either
[Edited by fordtacomaz on 6-18-2003 @ 04:23:31 PM]
|
|
| #36 |
6-18-2003 @ 04:23:45 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#31, That was the problem: We ended up with quite a bit of collateral damage, based on an assumption. Here was our reasoning:
If we don't attack Iraq, Irag might attack us. In other words, he have to kill people because if we don't people might die.
|
|
| #40 |
6-18-2003 @ 04:26:13 PM |
| Posted By : Asakha |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#36, The whole US justice is based under "innocent untill proven guilty". Unfortunately it only works in US :oP
|
Showing page: 2 of 7
[ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
