|
|
|
This image is a repost.
Final Stats:
Total Votes |
1 |
Average Score |
10.00 |
Verdict |
Bad
|
Picture
Information
|
URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=27338 |
|
Comments: 28 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 09-25-2003
|
View Stats |
Category:
Off-topic |
|
Description:
For the record, I didnt vote for Bush, so none of this is my fault. |
Showing page: 1 of 2 [ 1 2 ]
|
#1 |
9-26-2003 @ 12:05:32 AM |
Posted By : WhtHotZ28 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
That reminds me of a bumber sticker I saw:
Don't blame me, I voted with the majority!!
|
|
#2 |
9-26-2003 @ 07:28:02 AM |
Posted By : Asakha |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Anyway, would it have been really different if someone else had won the election ? |
|
#4 |
9-26-2003 @ 09:42:44 AM |
Posted By : kstagger |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#3, oh no - the right-wing conspiracy people are here...
[Edited by kstagger on 9-26-2003 @ 09:43:00 AM] |
|
#5 |
9-26-2003 @ 09:51:31 AM |
Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#3, You're pathetic if you believe that. Our Presidents are appointed with electoral college system that weights states by populations rather than a simple vote count (which is impossible to accurately do, there's always a margin of error). It's a fair system that we've used for a long time and has never failed us.
Besides, if Gore was President on 09/11/03, we'd probably still be getting attacked because he would've never reacted in a way to discourage it. |
|
#7 |
9-26-2003 @ 10:04:20 AM |
Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#6, Another fact...
The Democrats and Left side comdemn President Bush, saying he lied and is a war-thirsty dictator, yet why didn't those same people speak up when former-President Clinton not only made the same claims about Iraq and Hussein's threat, but he gave even MORE details, numbers, and facts about their threat to us? He let bin Laden go on THREE occasions that he was being handed to us as a prisonor (which was after he attacked us several times), and his only action on Iraq was to bomb an aspirin factory full of innocent Iraqi citizens. The Democrats are calling for impeachment of Bush, yet they didn't call for Clinton to be impeached when he made the SAME case for action in GREATER DETAIL., They didn't think Clinton should've been impeached for raping women and lying about it under oath while he wrapped up his time in personal lawsuits, and allowed the enemies to plot against us while he was focusing his time away from them, yet they want to impeach Bush for reacting to... |
|
#8 |
9-26-2003 @ 10:05:30 AM |
Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
...the murdering of 3000 of our citizens on one day, and promises of further attack.
They are walking contradictions who don't care about the people of the US, they only care about their quest for higher-paying political positions. |
|
#9 |
9-26-2003 @ 10:53:16 AM |
Posted By : solid_snake |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#3, go walking around where ever it is that you live, then find a random person and talk to them. then you can (hopefully) understand why we have the electoral college. |
|
#11 |
9-26-2003 @ 11:15:14 AM |
Posted By : jugg_al_o |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I suggest you all read "Stupid White Men", look at the facts (backed up by numerous sources in the mass media) and see that Bush did indeed manipulate, lie and cheat his way into the white house. |
|
#12 |
9-26-2003 @ 11:20:10 AM |
Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I suggest that YOU read "Dereliction of Duty" by Robert "Buzz" Patterson, a man that spent several years at Clinton's side and has some facts and stories about the Clintons that will make you VERY angry while reading it. He's a military man with nothing to gain by lying, and gives his eyewitness account of Clinton's job as President. |
|
#13 |
9-26-2003 @ 11:21:31 AM |
Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#11, "backed up by numerous sources in the mass media"
That doesn't sound like it would be very accurate, the media is far from trustworthy and they rarely care about reporting facts as much as entertaining, getting ratings, and pushing their prominately liberal agenda.
[Edited by mr_mcmunkee on 9-26-2003 @ 11:21:47 AM] |
|
#14 |
9-26-2003 @ 11:23:14 AM |
Posted By : jugg_al_o |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Hey Clinton and the Democrats are just as corrupt as every one else. At least Bush and the republicans have the balls to tell you upfront they are fucking you, instead of hiding behind the banner of the "people's party". Besides, you dont have any defense for bush? Just a misdirected attack? Who said I support Clinton? |
|
#16 |
9-26-2003 @ 11:28:00 AM |
Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I have plenty of support for Bush that I've expressed many times on this site. It's just funny how the people who attack Bush today never attacked Clinton for the same things in the past...and they condemn him for taking action to fix what came about from Clinton's ignorance of many situations.
And to say Clinton is "as corrupt" is a huge understatement. There is NO comparison between Clinton and any other President in history as far as corruption is concerned. |
|
#17 |
9-26-2003 @ 11:28:17 AM |
Posted By : kstagger |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#11, ah, where are the black helicopters... this kind of "it's all a coverup" logic is so paranoid... |
|
#19 |
9-26-2003 @ 11:30:21 AM |
Posted By : jugg_al_o |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Kst#17 you sound SOOO informed. I won't even fuck with this one. |
Showing page: 1 of 2 [ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|