Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 43287   By: wannabemustangjockey   Comment: "https://youtu.be/aFWp7EqJvt8?si=Pk-pzUMENIpe0AnQ..."
Car: 43287   By: Skid   Comment: "I never found them ugly, per se, but their overhea..."
Car: 43287   By: DiRF   Comment: "The thought that these might be considered ugly ne..."
Car: 97209   By: DiRF   Comment: "https://imgur.com/gallery/jXHGbR8..."
Car: 97209   By: DiRF   Comment: "Visited the museum again. He's added to his GT co..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

0 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password



This image has expired.

Final Stats:

Total Votes 7
Average Score 4.29
Verdict Good



Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=29520
Submitted by: DiRF
Comments: 81  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 2  (View)
Submitted on: 01-14-2004
View Stats Category: Off-topic
Description:
Eh, since Biohazard and jugg_a_lo get to submit a bunch of anti-Republican things....


   Comments

Showing page: 4 of 5
[
1 2 3 4 5 ]

#61
1-14-2004 @ 02:41:34 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
The "9/11 squad" was composed mostly of Saudi Arabians, operating out of Germany, UAE, and Afghanistan.

#62
1-14-2004 @ 02:42:47 PM
Posted By : Dadol21 Reply | Edit | Del
#58, Even though Iraq didnt have anything to do with Al Quaida(sp?) he had let terrorist harbor in his country. Saddam also was seeking chemical and bio weapons for what purpose we may never know but thankfully we took them out b4 we found out the hard way. We KNOW he had some chem/bio. weapons because he used them on his own ppl in the late 80's. The UN tried for 12 yrs. to get him to comply with a # of reslolution but he banned them from his country. Finally Bush and Powell got fed up with his runarounds and aurthorized war.

#63
1-14-2004 @ 02:43:10 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
#60, Basically, having political ties with Saudi Arabia that hurt us is non-partisen...both Dems and Repubs are corrupted by Saudi Arabia's money.

#64
1-14-2004 @ 02:43:58 PM
Posted By : thirtyseven Reply | Edit | Del
#62, Because we supplied him with the starter kits!!

#65
1-14-2004 @ 02:44:41 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
#59, I agree on Saudi Arabia. We should also reexamine our ties to Israel, IMO. They use just as many "low" tactics as Pakistan, and are constantly breaking cease fires, but you can't question them or else everyone will inexplicably label you an "anti-semite".

#66
1-14-2004 @ 02:45:18 PM
Posted By : thirtyseven Reply | Edit | Del
#63, I'm not taking sides, just pointing it out.

#67
1-14-2004 @ 02:48:37 PM
Posted By : thirtyseven Reply | Edit | Del
#65, A-FUCKING-MEN. How quickly they forget the prosecution and torture they endured under Hitler, only to do the same to the Palistinians. Our support of their tryanny is the cause of most ill will towards America in the middle east, IMO.

[Edited by thirtyseven on 1-14-2004 @ 02:49:34 PM]


#68
1-14-2004 @ 02:50:13 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
#65, "anti-semite" haHA...that's a funny phrase...what everyone forgets, is that the Muslims are technically "Semites" also. Look it up.

Yeah, Israel is basically an asshole nation... it's Europes fault. Before WWII, that area was shared by the native Muslims and native Jews, they co-existed, they didn't like each other, but they were cool as long as no one started any shit.

After WWII, the European Jews moved in, and asked the native Jews, "Why are you sharing your land with these other people? Kick them out!"...and 50+ years of bullshit commenced.


#69
1-14-2004 @ 02:51:09 PM
Posted By : Dadol21 Reply | Edit | Del
#67, Very true

#70
1-14-2004 @ 02:52:06 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
#68, what everyone forgets, is that the Muslims are technically "Semites" also. Look it up.

That's why I put it in quotation marks. :P


#71
1-14-2004 @ 03:03:30 PM
Posted By : mr_mcmunkee Reply | Edit | Del
Here's what I see coming for the election...

Dean/Kerry/Gebhardt/Clark are all setting themselves up for a repeat of the campaigns of Democrats like George McGovern, Walter Mondale, and Michael Dukakis. The claims they are making to win the party nomination will be the same stands that will lose the general election for them. All of the extreme-left stances and hatred for Bush they are displaying now will win over the people that will get them the Democratic nomination, but will never win over mainstream America. Clinton was a horrible President, but he was an incredible campaigner despite his dishonesty. At least he knew history and was destined not to repeat it, he had the sense to move further to the right to win over voters while he was running. Of course when he got into to office, he abandoned that stance and returned to the left...but none of the current Democrat candidates are doing that, except maybe Joe Leiberman. I think Joe Leiberman is the only...


#72
1-14-2004 @ 03:04:09 PM
Posted By : mr_mcmunkee Reply | Edit | Del
Democarat who COULD win, but he won't because he can't win the Democratic nomination with his support of the war and defending national security.

#73
1-14-2004 @ 03:07:53 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
#72, Also, Joe Lieberman being Jewish would REALLY hurt the Muslim viewpoint of America...I'm not saying him being Jewish is bad, but the fact that he is wouldn't help the way Muslims view America.

#74
1-14-2004 @ 03:10:25 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
#71, You know, that DOES make a lot of sense... JFK, Carter, AND Clinton were not the ones people thought would win the Democrat nomination, because they weren't left enough in their primary campaigns....but they all won by a slim margain, and because they didn't go crazy campaigning to the left, they had a good shot of winning the presidency.

#75
1-14-2004 @ 03:38:53 PM
Posted By : VonChad Reply | Edit | Del
#40, have you actually read Franken's book? (That's not a retort; that's an actual question.)

#76
1-14-2004 @ 03:58:11 PM
Posted By : solid_snake Reply | Edit | Del
#29, it's not bush bashing. it's president bashing, which happens all the time regaurdless of who is in office.

#77
1-14-2004 @ 05:17:45 PM
Posted By : Obsidian Reply | Edit | Del
Yank politics.

Seem like one awful big bloodbath.


#78
1-14-2004 @ 05:42:25 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
#76, This is true. No matter who's in office, the other side will always call him a "horrible president", just because he has that little "R" or "D" after his name.

#79
9-09-2005 @ 12:28:04 AM
Posted By : 427 Vette Reply | Edit | Del
Politics suck, that's my opinion.



:D


#80
11-12-2006 @ 12:36:14 AM
Posted By : MxCx Reply | Edit | Del
#77, Too true.

Showing page: 4 of 5
[
1 2 3 4 5 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Tuesday, April 16, 2024 12:19:16 PM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.