|
|
|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=57421 |
|
| Comments: 11 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 11-15-2006
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Vehicle Group |
|
|
Description:
A pair of Mustangs |
Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]
 |
| #2 |
11-15-2006 @ 10:26:54 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Compared to the SN95, it has roughly another 6" of wheelbase, 4" of overall length, 2.5" of front track, 1" of overall width, and 1.5" of height. Of course, with the flatter hood, it looks bigger still.
|
|
| #4 |
11-15-2006 @ 10:28:07 PM |
| Posted By : Subourbon187 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I never realized how bulky the damn things are, espescially when you see them next to Expeditions and Super Duties at Ford Dealerships
|
|
| #9 |
11-15-2006 @ 10:34:13 PM |
| Posted By : solid_snake |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#2, I was parked by one the other day and it is noticeably huge.
|
|
| #10 |
11-15-2006 @ 10:35:30 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#9, I think it may be bigger than the XBOX.
edit: Seriously, I wouldn't even consider an S197 until both Griggs and MM come up with full suspension "solutions" for them. I know they're much better, out of the box, than the Fox/SN95 chassis, but I can freaking guarantee you that I've got a weight advantage over the S197 and I'm not really surrendering much to one in terms of suspension setup.
[Edited by Lemming on 11-15-2006 @ 10:39:35 PM]
|
|
| #11 |
12-18-2006 @ 05:21:16 PM |
| Posted By : Disrupture |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#5, I'm 100% with you on that. Lets hide from those damn haters !
|
Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
