Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 92199   By: Low-Tech Redneck   Comment: "[citation needed]..."
Car: 92199   By: DiRF   Comment: "The wording on the Wikipedia leads me to believe t..."
Car: 92199   By: Adambomb   Comment: "I believe they all have it, I recall reading about..."
Car: 96433   By: Adambomb   Comment: "https://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4473/37723004931_aef..."
Car: 96489   By: Skid   Comment: "Probably a '73. That year combined the soft nose w..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

1 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password



This image has expired.

Final Stats:

Total Votes 13
Average Score 2.08
Verdict Not Rice



Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=67061
Submitted by: thontor
Comments: 37  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 1  (View)
Submitted on: 09-19-2007
View Stats Category: Car
Description:
Holden Ute
there's talk of bringing it over to the US but NOT as a Chevrolet..

so either Pontiac or GMC is most likely, here's a couple of chops i've seen:
Pontiac G8 Ute?
http://img463.imageshack.us/img463/7140/untitledhi4.png
GMC Caballero?.. i'd rather they call it Typhoon or Syclone
http://img521.imageshack.us/img521/...maloodn1xz1.jpg


   Comments

Showing page: 2 of 2
[
1 2 ]

#21
9-20-2007 @ 07:36:46 AM
Posted By : Sensekhmet Reply | Edit | Del
#20, Or a Civic Type R. Or a BMW.

[Edited by Sensekhmet on 9-20-2007 @ 07:37:24 AM]


#22
9-20-2007 @ 03:54:49 PM
Posted By : thontor Reply | Edit | Del
#16, Bob Lutz himself has stated, on more than one occasion that it won't be a Chevy

In reference to his line that a Ute sold in the U.S. would not be badged a Chevrolet, Mr. Lutz added, "The Chevy product portfolio is too full to add this to it. We'd do it as either a Pontiac or GMC."
http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/19/...it-will-happen/


#23
9-20-2007 @ 04:11:15 PM
Posted By : wannabemustangjockey Reply | Edit | Del
#22, Lutz is turning his back on the company's heritage once again. Is he really so blind that he can't see that a Chevy El Camino is more appropriate than a Pontiac pickup or a GMC version of what should be a Chevy? There's a reason why you rarely see old Sprints or Caballeros.

#24
9-20-2007 @ 04:45:47 PM
Posted By : Driven_out Reply | Edit | Del
#23, I think he's trying to shy away from doing too much reviving old names on a rebadge car

#25
9-20-2007 @ 04:50:17 PM
Posted By : wannabemustangjockey Reply | Edit | Del
#24, It's way too late to recover from that.

#26
9-20-2007 @ 05:08:24 PM
Posted By : Driven_out Reply | Edit | Del
#25, either way, if this comes over, im getting one

#27
9-20-2007 @ 05:42:24 PM
Posted By : thontor Reply | Edit | Del
#23, what part of "The Chevy product portfolio is too full" do you not understand?

#28
9-20-2007 @ 05:59:51 PM
Posted By : wannabemustangjockey Reply | Edit | Del
#27, That doesn't stop them from producing more redundant SUVs...

#29
9-20-2007 @ 06:15:49 PM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
#23, I know heritage is important, without a strong heritage important automobile manufacturers wouldn't have anything to show for their labors nor would they have anything to differentiate them from their competitors. But heritage is just that, heritage; as in "the past". And this is 2007, what held true 30 or 40 years ago doesn't hold true now, but you don't need me to tell you that. And what I mean to say is that this cars name and what make a small group of fanboys think it should "be" doesn't mean shit. GM will name it what it wants to (provided it comes to the states), price it how it wants to, market it how it wants to and then, as a consumer, you can buy one and call it the "Flaming Penis Wagon" if you want. Until then, stop bitching.

#30
9-20-2007 @ 06:20:16 PM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
#29, I'm not trying to be a dick, I just think you're beating a dead horse.

#31
9-20-2007 @ 06:24:23 PM
Posted By : wannabemustangjockey Reply | Edit | Del
#30, I gave up hope on the auto industry back in '05. If it works out for them, great, if not, there's nothing I can do about it.

#32
9-20-2007 @ 06:30:11 PM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
#31, Well, GM producing (importing) a new car I actually want to buy besides the...err...well I liked the...uhhh...O.K. the first personally desirable car from them in a while is worth something. Hate all you want but you can't deny it's a quality car.

#33
9-20-2007 @ 08:24:31 PM
Posted By : MxCx Reply | Edit | Del
#20, Thank you for that intelligent and well thought out response. Let me go snap some pictures of uninteresting cars in my apt lot.

#34
9-20-2007 @ 08:59:56 PM
Posted By : ricerocketboy Reply | Edit | Del
#33, you should post more pictures you take of cars. Oh wait. Why is it that the person who bitches most about it, doesn't post? I mean after all, you're DFW which has some pretty nice cars as I recall.

#35
9-21-2007 @ 05:07:04 PM
Posted By : Tastycakemix Reply | Edit | Del
#18, *snicker*
The new GMC Oi with standard AWD


#36
9-21-2007 @ 05:35:30 PM
Posted By : Driven_out Reply | Edit | Del
I'd drive a GMC Oi!

#37
9-21-2007 @ 11:24:25 PM
Posted By : MxCx Reply | Edit | Del
#34, Why is it that he assumes Im a Honda/Japanese fanboy? Its about as annoying as the majority of cars hes posted.

Showing page: 2 of 2
[
1 2 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 12:16:00 AM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright 2000 - 2017 Ricecop. All rights reserved.