|
|
|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
0 |
| Average Score |
0.00 |
| Verdict |
Not Rice
|
Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]
 |
| #2 |
1-10-2008 @ 05:54:37 PM |
| Posted By : thirtyseven |
Reply | Edit | Del |
That R34 must be tiny 'cause the GTR is not that large looking in person.
I always thought the old R cars were huge - guess I was wrong.
|
|
| #3 |
1-10-2008 @ 06:06:03 PM |
| Posted By : MxCx |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I never thought the Rs were that big, but damn.
|
|
| #4 |
1-10-2008 @ 07:39:25 PM |
| Posted By : Subourbon187 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I know the cars pictured, the Vette, Supra and all them are comparatively small automobiles but I never realized how big the GT-R was in comparison. And I can't say that I'm surprised.
|
|
| #5 |
1-10-2008 @ 07:46:58 PM |
| Posted By : MxCx |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I think the camera lens may be to blame. I know Evos dont look that big compared to anything. (first linked pic)
|
|
| #7 |
1-10-2008 @ 08:00:31 PM |
| Posted By : MxCx |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#6, Nope. Cant do that. Its Japanese, therefore very light and very good in the twisties.
[Edited by MxCx on 1-10-2008 @ 08:00:54 PM]
|
|
| #9 |
1-10-2008 @ 08:08:06 PM |
| Posted By : Obsidian |
Reply | Edit | Del |
And I thought the C3's were big! Bloody fuck!
|
|
| #16 |
1-11-2008 @ 12:48:46 AM |
| Posted By : Subourbon187 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I always thought of the R32 and R33 being about the dimensions of your average small-midsize car, but I figured the R34 would be closer in size to say, an SN-95 Mustang. Hmmm...I guess not. But the new GT-R looks to be about the size of my Chrysler in comparison, I know it weighs about as much.
|
|
| #18 |
1-11-2008 @ 08:26:04 AM |
| Posted By : motopsycho |
Reply | Edit | Del |
having driven next to an R car on a public street, I would compare it to a 300ZX 2+2 or larger last gen Prelude as far as size.
|
Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
View Stats
