Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: Fpost   By: DiRF   Comment: "Now do Classical Gas!..."
Car: 98681   By: DiRF   Comment: "This must have been right around 1979, when the US..."
Car: Fpost   By: DiRF   Comment: "Very nice...."
Car: Fpost   By: Adambomb   Comment: "So, I pre-odered these last August and they finall..."
Car: 98680   By: Skid   Comment: "Neat! I don't know if I've ever seen one of these ..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

0 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password



This image has expired.

Final Stats:

Total Votes 214
Average Score 3.23
Verdict Not Rice



Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=7868
Submitted by: Lemming
Comments: 91  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 0  (View)
Submitted on: 07-13-2002
View Stats Category: Car
Photoshops of this image:
7925, 10531, 20366, 21005,
Description:
I don't have a pic of my current car, but here's one of me looking goofy with my old
one, a 1993 Thunderbird LX/V6.


   Comments

Showing page: 2 of 5
[
1 2 3 4 5 ]

#21
9-05-2002 @ 02:14:14 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
Dunno...I don't like the **NUKED** thing Trooper did...it makes it weird for me to delete a double post.

#22
9-05-2002 @ 02:14:54 PM
Posted By : Jon Reply | Edit | Del
Oh thats what is, now I remember.

#23
9-05-2002 @ 02:15:17 PM
Posted By : mr_mcmunkee Reply | Edit | Del
YO! I edited it and it still got nuked, let me say this AGAIN!!!!!!!!

I have a camera in my glove compartment filling up with some great rice pics, including the new #1 Ricer I bet. I'll get it developed when I take a few more and scan them. I really need to get a digital camera for these things.


#24
9-05-2002 @ 02:16:17 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
#18, T'would be nice if the system would determine if the reply needed to be numbered, i.e. if you're replying to a comment, it only shows the number if your post doesn't show up right after the one you're replying to.

It's hard to tell where your post is going to show up when a comment frenzy hits *cough*yao*cough*.


#25
9-05-2002 @ 02:19:16 PM
Posted By : mr_mcmunkee Reply | Edit | Del
YAO GINSU CHI is dead. :(

#26
9-05-2002 @ 02:20:04 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
YAO GINSU CHI?

#27
9-05-2002 @ 02:20:56 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
#26, A fake person Mcmunkee created an account for. He was a badly confused guy from Singapore.

#28
9-05-2002 @ 02:21:51 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
lol

#29
9-05-2002 @ 02:23:54 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
mr_mcmunkee! Do you remember where the legendary yao threads are?

#30
9-05-2002 @ 02:26:53 PM
Posted By : stang392 Reply | Edit | Del
5682 is the yao thread

#31
9-05-2002 @ 02:29:12 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
Yes! That's outstanding stuff. And it was right after all that ultraz81 stuff, so it really drove me crazy..

#32
9-05-2002 @ 02:32:31 PM
Posted By : Trooper  Reply | Edit | Del
#21, Well to make the replies work right I need a consistent comment count so that's why I added the **nuked** thing. I guess my thing that checks for double posts doesn't work too good.. I'll have to revamp it a bit.

#33
9-05-2002 @ 02:34:34 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
#32, Is there any way you can add a check to make sure that replies that show up immediately after the post they're replying to don't get numbered?

In other words, if this is comment 33, it shouldn't need to be "32,....." for it to be a reply to #32.

[Edited by Lemming on 9-05-2002 @ 02:34:59 PM]


#34
9-05-2002 @ 02:35:59 PM
Posted By : mr_mcmunkee Reply | Edit | Del
DiRF, also look at 9077. That was Yao's gift to Ginsu. He spoke on a few other cars too, I know there was a lowrider with a girl whom he could not believe the outfit she was wearing.

#35
9-05-2002 @ 02:37:06 PM
Posted By : mr_mcmunkee Reply | Edit | Del
#33, Yeah, don't hit the reply button.

#36
9-05-2002 @ 02:38:18 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
Well, as I've said, in times when there's a fair bit of activity, it's hard to tell whether it's necessary to hit the reply button or not.

#37
9-05-2002 @ 02:38:19 PM
Posted By : Trooper  Reply | Edit | Del
#33, I could but that would get confusing if someone didn't intend for it to be a reply. You could always just not hit the "Reply" link too :)

#38
9-06-2002 @ 08:03:05 AM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
Ricers hit this site hard last night, I'd guess. This car got bumped out of the top 10 (not that I'm surprised) and a lot of the top 10 are over 3.0 now.

#39
9-06-2002 @ 08:14:03 AM
Posted By : stang392 Reply | Edit | Del
yeah but in doing so they put Max's stang back in the top ten

[Edited by stang392 on 9-06-2002 @ 08:14:26 AM]


#40
9-06-2002 @ 08:32:51 AM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
True.

Showing page: 2 of 5
[
1 2 3 4 5 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Sunday, May 5, 2024 04:49:26 AM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.