|
|
|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
214 |
| Average Score |
3.23 |
| Verdict |
Not Rice
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=7868 |
|
| Comments: 91 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 07-13-2002
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
Photoshops of this image:
7925, 10531, 20366, 21005, |
Description:
I don't have a pic of my current car, but here's one of me looking goofy with my old
one, a 1993 Thunderbird LX/V6. |
Showing page: 3 of 5
[ 1 2 3 4 5 ]
 |
| #41 |
9-10-2002 @ 12:14:24 AM |
| Posted By : 8ate8 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
nuked means a deleted post..
and lemming, j00 had a tbird? nice :):)
|
|
| #42 |
10-18-2002 @ 01:41:23 AM |
| Posted By : 95T-Bird |
Reply | Edit | Del |
The MN12's where too heavy for Six's. I had a 92' Cougar for a time, thing was underpowerd like Cruse liner powerd by Goats on a Tred Mill. My 95' Bird's got the V-8 and it does fine. But that engine isn't going to stay in too long. I'm getting one of the Mustang Cobra engines to put in er.
|
|
| #43 |
11-14-2002 @ 09:24:04 AM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I agree. The 3.8 was adequate for cruising and mild city driving, and it had enough low-end torque to move OK from a stop, but it really lacked power overall, considering that the car weighed ~3600lb or so. 140 hp/215 lb-ft just wasn't enough. My Mustang is noticeably quicker, but it weighs around 500lb less and has about 50 hp more. Still, the T-bird was a great cruiser/highway driver and it would've been quite good with a V8.
|
|
| #44 |
1-15-2003 @ 01:50:53 PM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
i looked at a 1995 mercury cougar xr7 yesterday...going to drive it today...100k, V8, auto, loaded with leather, looks real nice
|
|
| #46 |
1-15-2003 @ 01:52:59 PM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Yeah, with that many miles, don't race it or beat the engine in any way...and it'll last for a while and make a nice car.
|
|
| #47 |
1-15-2003 @ 01:54:42 PM |
| Posted By : MaxSE |
Reply | Edit | Del |
its ambient...he'll get into trouble with it
|
|
| #48 |
1-15-2003 @ 01:55:57 PM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
whats the XR7 package? this one has the black vinyl roof and 16's, with a spoiler
|
|
| #49 |
1-15-2003 @ 01:59:34 PM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#48, That's not a XR7, I don't think. That was a performance package, not a granny-vinyl top package.
|
|
| #50 |
1-15-2003 @ 02:00:31 PM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
it said XR7 on it, and it had all those things...i would doubt that anybody switched the tags
|
|
| #54 |
1-15-2003 @ 02:07:12 PM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Pretty reliable, I see a lot of Cougars still on the road. Just don't pretend you're on a racetrack with it. That applies to any car, but especially one with 100K miles.
|
|
| #55 |
1-15-2003 @ 02:09:42 PM |
| Posted By : solid_snake |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#54, actualy BMW bought turbo V6s with ~70K street miles to use as a basis for there race engines at one point
|
|
| #56 |
1-15-2003 @ 02:12:45 PM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
When you don't know how the previous owners treated it, and it has 100K miles, it's better to play it safe and treat it right.
|
|
| #57 |
1-15-2003 @ 02:13:05 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
That year XR7, if it actually had a V8, would be the 4.6L SOHC version that they use in Mustangs. Not too fast; around 200hp in that calibration and trim level.
They also came with the 3.8 V6, around 140-150hp.
Thunderbirds were available with the 3.8SC until 1995; it was good for ~220 hp and had 315 lb-ft of torque or so.
|
|
| #58 |
1-15-2003 @ 02:13:07 PM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#54 awesome highway cruisers with all the options and the V8...i think im gona take it on the highway for my test drive today :P
|
|
| #60 |
1-15-2003 @ 02:14:44 PM |
| Posted By : solid_snake |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#56, that goes with any amount of miles really 50K with a bad driver can be just as bad as 100K
|
Showing page: 3 of 5
[ 1 2 3 4 5 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
