|
|
|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
176 |
| Average Score |
3.03 |
| Verdict |
Not Rice
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=11778 |
|
| Comments: 25 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 09-27-2002
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
Koenig Ferrari F50 Twin-FUCKING-turbo. I want this car soooo bad. |
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
 |
| #3 |
9-27-2002 @ 11:18:12 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
ok so if these cars came with out turbos and somone added twins that is just insane
|
|
| #4 |
9-27-2002 @ 11:20:29 PM |
| Posted By : Kakoriat |
Reply | Edit | Del |
delated, nm what I wrote
[Edited by Kakoriat on 9-27-2002 @ 11:21:02 PM]
|
|
| #6 |
9-27-2002 @ 11:28:20 PM |
| Posted By : motopsycho |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#1 TOP 10 NON RICER
thats what i meant.
[Edited by motopsycho on 9-27-2002 @ 11:28:32 PM]
|
|
| #10 |
9-28-2002 @ 09:45:20 AM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#7, It's a 4.7L V12, naturally aspirated. You're right about the F40, though--it was a twin-turbocharged V8.
Of the two, I actually like the F40 better, but that's just me.
|
|
| #11 |
9-28-2002 @ 09:47:56 AM |
| Posted By : AtEase |
Reply | Edit | Del |
The engine in the F50 is taken from their F1 car from 1990, the last time they had a V12 anyway. The F40 has the same engine as the 1984 GTO, but with more bigger turbos.
|
|
| #16 |
11-21-2002 @ 11:46:32 PM |
| Posted By : CRXtrackguy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#11, It's not a F1 engine. For one, F1 engines have NEVER been that big, and secondly it wouldn't last more than 5 or 6 hours if you were lucky
|
|
| #17 |
11-21-2002 @ 11:52:07 PM |
| Posted By : comradesampo |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#16, The first couple F1 seasons had a 1.5L blown/4.5L unblown formula; I think it'd be fairly trivial to get an extra 200cc out of a 4.5L V12. Of course, that was fifty years ago.
|
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
