|
|
|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
219 |
| Average Score |
2.70 |
| Verdict |
Not Rice
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=12771 |
|
| Comments: 430 (Read/Post) Favorites: 2 (View) |
Submitted
on: 10-16-2002
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
balls to the walls |
Showing page: 5 of 22
[ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ]
 |
| #82 |
10-22-2002 @ 04:11:28 PM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
They are boxy. All older Japanese cars are shoeboxes with wheels to me.
|
|
| #83 |
10-22-2002 @ 04:11:44 PM |
| Posted By : Jurrell |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#81, I never said it was a race car, just a nice hauler that gets great MPG to get me from point A to B
|
|
| #84 |
10-22-2002 @ 04:11:47 PM |
| Posted By : Keisuke_Turbo |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#78 i have the one the fastest inline 4's in my city wit under 15 grand down to it and it is setup for autocross and road course
|
|
| #86 |
10-22-2002 @ 04:12:39 PM |
| Posted By : kstagger |
Reply | Edit | Del |
original 240Z was not fast - churning high 16s in the 1/4 mile. Still a neat car... alot better with a Chevy 350 in it though.
|
|
| #88 |
10-22-2002 @ 04:13:12 PM |
| Posted By : Keisuke_Turbo |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#85 exactly man that is your opinion man and you are entitled to it
|
|
| #89 |
10-22-2002 @ 04:13:15 PM |
| Posted By : TinIndian |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#79 I don't give a happy shit if Japan builds a 10L engine, it'll still have no fucking torque. And that I will chalk up to a stupid "gentleman's agreement". Pontiac and Ford share a patent on torque, LOL.
|
|
| #92 |
10-22-2002 @ 04:14:06 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#79, Could be, couldn't be, who knows? Japan doesn't have a special technology or techniqe that no other country has. You can't say "If the Japanese built a big engine it would outrun American engines of the same size", because there you have the assumption that Japan builds all good engines and the U.S. builds all crappy engines, and that sounds a bit like xenophobia on your part.
|
|
| #93 |
10-22-2002 @ 04:14:27 PM |
| Posted By : Keisuke_Turbo |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#86 it cost 3grand new and i wasnt talkin stock i have 67grand to spend on it lol =)
|
|
| #96 |
10-22-2002 @ 04:16:24 PM |
| Posted By : Keisuke_Turbo |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#92 i said it would have high hp not that it would beat anything
#89 the r34 has more torque then hp and the torque peaks at 4400rpm
[Edited by Keisuke_Turbo on 10-22-2002 @ 04:17:21 PM]
|
|
| #98 |
10-22-2002 @ 04:16:48 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Actually, speaking from Datsun Z ownership experience, they wouldn't work too well with a 350 V8, because it completely goes against the sports car principle of a Z. Now a 283 or a 302 or a 305 would be another story. :)
[Edited by Skid on 10-22-2002 @ 04:17:49 PM]
|
|
| #99 |
10-22-2002 @ 04:17:57 PM |
| Posted By : TinIndian |
Reply | Edit | Del |
$10k and I'll stomp any ricerboy into the ground with my fuckin' CAPRICE. It's called a crate engine... 650hp. So let's see, $10,400 (not including cost of oil change (= ) and I've got a car that'll kill an $80k Skyline, and be a sleeper, at that. Works for me.
|
|
| #100 |
10-22-2002 @ 04:18:04 PM |
| Posted By : Jurrell |
Reply | Edit | Del |
damn you guys are mean, if someone throws out a different opinion, you jump on them like a pack of dogs, shame on all of you
|
Showing page: 5 of 22
[ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
