|
|
|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
219 |
| Average Score |
2.70 |
| Verdict |
Not Rice
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=12771 |
|
| Comments: 430 (Read/Post) Favorites: 2 (View) |
Submitted
on: 10-16-2002
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
balls to the walls |
Showing page: 4 of 22
[ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ]
 |
| #61 |
10-22-2002 @ 04:05:33 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#53, Japan is cool. I've just never favored Japanese cars much, and it's the Japanese car owners that originally started this whole rice thing.
|
|
| #65 |
10-22-2002 @ 04:06:20 PM |
| Posted By : TinIndian |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#56 2 out of 5 say turbo, for the Z cars I'm sure it's implied. In others words, WEAK.
|
|
| #66 |
10-22-2002 @ 04:06:53 PM |
| Posted By : Jurrell |
Reply | Edit | Del |
you know what would kick ass???
A rear wheel drive
rear engine
sideways V-8
DO YOU KNOW HOW FAST THAT WOULD BE?
|
|
| #68 |
10-22-2002 @ 04:07:14 PM |
| Posted By : Keisuke_Turbo |
Reply | Edit | Del |
# all wit mods and not even that expensive to be done still way under 70k
|
|
| #69 |
10-22-2002 @ 04:07:17 PM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#56, Nothing there impresses me, and how can you call the above-pictured car boxy when you mention those old boxy Jap cars?
|
|
| #70 |
10-22-2002 @ 04:07:23 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#64, thats not stock, i have that mag, thats with simple bolt ons
|
|
| #71 |
10-22-2002 @ 04:08:13 PM |
| Posted By : TinIndian |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#54, #55 I wish I could remember the # of the post where he and I argued the Skyline. Trust me, he is.
|
|
| #72 |
10-22-2002 @ 04:08:18 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
To sum up, since the new Cobra can produce 400 rear-wheel horsepower (about 480 at the flywheel) and 11-second passes with minimal modi-fications
|
|
| #73 |
10-22-2002 @ 04:08:27 PM |
| Posted By : Jurrell |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#66, its like 0% hp loss and power directly to the wheels, damn I need to work for GM!
|
|
| #75 |
10-22-2002 @ 04:09:13 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
The 390 hp rating of the Cobra is the NET horsepower rating, which is measured at the flywheel.
|
|
| #77 |
10-22-2002 @ 04:09:23 PM |
| Posted By : TinIndian |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#66 Fiero, with engine swap. Quick, but not amazingly fast. Respectable, though.
|
|
| #78 |
10-22-2002 @ 04:09:50 PM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
70K for a fast car? GEESH! I could build a car for 15K that would beat it AND look better. (#68)
[Edited by mr_mcmunkee on 10-22-2002 @ 04:10:51 PM]
|
|
| #79 |
10-22-2002 @ 04:09:55 PM |
| Posted By : Keisuke_Turbo |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#69 they arent boxy
#65 they are all also under 3 litres can you say the same for your cars im sure if japan made a 6 litre car it would have those numbers in fact check the new lexus wit 4.5 litre v8 wit around 360 hp stock
|
|
| #80 |
10-22-2002 @ 04:10:53 PM |
| Posted By : solid_snake |
Reply | Edit | Del |
no mods biotches
"Without so much as a how-do-you-do, we tied down the bone-stock Cobra on the PHP Dynojet and were collectively impressed when we saw peaks of 360.7 hp and 358.7 lb-ft of torque displayed after our first pull. It’s worth noting the figures we’re quoting here are the absolute peaks recorded by the dyno. These usually occurred in between the 100-rpm reporting points shown in our charted printouts. Assuming a typical 17-percent loss through the drivetrain, this rear-wheel power equates to somewhere well north of 425 ponies at the flywheel from a factory-stock 281 "
|
Showing page: 4 of 22
[ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
