|
|
|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
19 |
| Average Score |
3.63 |
| Verdict |
Good
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=14343 |
|
| Comments: 23 (Read/Post) Favorites: 1 (View) |
Submitted
on: 11-12-2002
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Vehicle Misc |
|
|
Description:
My Talon's engine bay. (notice the complete lack of anything yellow, or R related) |
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
 |
| #1 |
11-12-2002 @ 12:50:18 AM |
| Posted By : cams116 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
RED But yeah not too bad. Whats the engines code name, like the GTR skylines engine is the RB26DETT, so whats the code for this cars engine?
|
|
| #3 |
11-12-2002 @ 01:09:53 AM |
| Posted By : Boost420a |
Reply | Edit | Del |
For those who don't know, the engine is Mitsubishi's 4G63.
2.0L 4 cylinder turbo
122 cubic inches, 1997cc
Capable of ~450 reliable horsepower on the stock bottom end. This is Mitsubishi's race engine which was designed in the mid 80's for small displacement applications. Iron block, aluminum head. It came in the 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse and Eagle Talon. Also the 90-94 Plymouth Laser and the 91-92 Mitsubish Galant VR-4. It came in a variety of cars in non-turbo form as well, and will be reappearing in it's true turbocharged state in the 2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution.
|
|
| #6 |
11-12-2002 @ 02:37:15 AM |
| Posted By : Boost420a |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I was just refering to the U.S. Market, but yes, the 4g63 was in all EVOs.
|
|
| #8 |
11-12-2002 @ 04:41:28 AM |
| Posted By : cams116 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#5, Yeah thats what I was wondering, I thought it was that engine, just the evo engine is somewhat better.
|
|
| #10 |
11-12-2002 @ 08:47:20 AM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
For an engine that's not particularly large (in terms of displacement, anyway) it really looks like it's shoehorned in there.
|
|
| #11 |
11-12-2002 @ 08:48:33 AM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I was thinking that too...quite crowded for such a tiny engine.
|
|
| #13 |
11-12-2002 @ 08:50:37 AM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#11, Well, in terms of external dimensions, it's probably not so tiny. For one thing, DOHC engines usually have very large valve covers and stuff.
|
|
| #14 |
11-12-2002 @ 08:54:34 AM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
True, my 2.0 DOHC Zetec engine looks bigger than it really is.
|
|
| #15 |
11-12-2002 @ 08:57:20 AM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Heck, the 4.6 in the current Mustangs have similar external dimensions to 400+ cid. big blocks.
|
|
| #17 |
11-12-2002 @ 09:01:11 AM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
It's the same length if I recall (it can take the same heads as a 4.6), but it's rather tall.
|
|
| #18 |
11-15-2002 @ 03:49:41 PM |
| Posted By : Boost420a |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#8, it is the exact same engine as the EVO 1-3. The engine was swapped to the other side of the bay for 4 and up EVOs. That is why the 1st few EVO model engines are a direct bolt-in for 1st generation DSMs in the US market.
|
|
| #19 |
4-20-2003 @ 03:47:08 PM |
| Posted By : Kakoriat |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Very nice, is that a 20G turbo you got there? I want to put a 6-bolt in my my Talon, then no more fear of crankwalk!
|
|
| #20 |
1-23-2004 @ 12:55:33 AM |
| Posted By : Boost420a |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#19,
Nope, it is a Forced Performance Green turbo. Sort of a hybrid between a 20G and a Garret. It can support about 500hp and is extremely streetable. (full boost (20psi) at around 3700rpm). Check out FP at www.forcedperformance.net
|
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
