|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
Picture
Information
|
URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=18232 |
|
Comments: 48 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 02-01-2003
|
View Stats |
Category:
Off-topic |
|
Description:
R.I.P |
Showing page: 2 of 3 [ 1 2 3 ]
|
#22 |
2-01-2003 @ 05:43:16 PM |
Posted By : solid_snake |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I find it interesting that it happeed on the same week as the challenger's aniversiry. apollo 1's also accordind to DiRF |
|
#23 |
2-01-2003 @ 05:46:38 PM |
Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Hopefully, whatever happened was at least fast and relatively painless. With speeds like that, I'd figure so. |
|
#24 |
2-01-2003 @ 05:49:55 PM |
Posted By : fordtacomaz |
Reply | Edit | Del |
ok i think im done with topic. i dont like thinking about it |
|
#25 |
2-01-2003 @ 07:25:51 PM |
Posted By : hangyeehouse |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Just a little question, nothing hostile... but why are they heros? This is just an accident and only 7 people died. Now think of an airliner 747 exploded in mid-air, they casualties whould be much much more higher. |
|
#26 |
2-01-2003 @ 08:28:16 PM |
Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
dont take this the wrong way, but i bet the Russians are loving this. for the first time snice the 80s there back on top in space |
|
#27 |
2-01-2003 @ 09:23:10 PM |
Posted By : Jurrell |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I don't know how they would be on top, I'm sure america has other shuttles |
|
#28 |
2-01-2003 @ 09:24:52 PM |
Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#26, And their space program is really something to be proud of, eh? They've had far more fatalities than us, but generally do a better job of writing people out of the history books. Um, I mean, doing damage control :-) |
|
#29 |
2-01-2003 @ 09:26:31 PM |
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#28, by the time Challenger happened, the Russians had lost around 8 men in training/liftoff/re-entry accidents
And the Russians are hardly on top, their space program is bankrupt, that's why they kept MIR up for so long, it was thier only source of income |
|
#30 |
2-01-2003 @ 09:29:31 PM |
Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#27, but ours wont be flying for a long time, they will still be sending the rockets up |
|
#32 |
2-01-2003 @ 09:30:56 PM |
Posted By : VonChad |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#25, normally I'm also asking that question... but the astronauts knew full well that there was a good chance of something bad happening, but they still went up to further the space program and knowledge about space... they didn't just fly for the sake of getting somewhere like people on a 747 would be.
That's my take on it, anyway. |
|
#33 |
2-01-2003 @ 09:33:59 PM |
Posted By : Jurrell |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Some jackass in another (unnamed) forum made this insensitive joke
Need
Another
Seven
Astronauts
God I wanted to punch him in his face, that is the worst thing you could say right now. |
|
#34 |
2-01-2003 @ 09:35:38 PM |
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#31, A website I was researching earlier say that the the best guess is that since 1963, the Soviet/Russian space program has lost about 163 men, from ground workers to cosmonauts in various accidents, compared to 18 very public deaths in the US space program, don't look for the shuttles to fly again for the next 5 years at least, and when they do, it may be the new next-generation ones, this may have just forced the last of the first generation shuttles into retirement |
|
#38 |
2-01-2003 @ 09:39:59 PM |
Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#34, yeah cause i dont think they will use the two older ones, and their not going to want to use one over and over again. also their not going to waste more money to build new ones (current ones) just to replace them in a few years |
|
#39 |
2-01-2003 @ 09:45:48 PM |
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Not many folks stop to think, that the shuttle is high-tech, but they are upgraded airframes that originaly flew in the early 80's, your average shuttle is as almost as old as the oldest still-flying 747's |
|
#40 |
2-02-2003 @ 02:05:18 AM |
Posted By : StillRuns |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#25, They're heroes because they risked...no...because they gave their lives to increase our understanding of the universe. |
Showing page: 2 of 3 [ 1 2 3 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|