|
|
|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
236 |
| Average Score |
3.73 |
| Verdict |
Not Rice
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=22540 |
|
| Comments: 131 (Read/Post) Favorites: 1 (View) |
Submitted
on: 05-12-2003
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
Cobra R for sale! |
Showing page: 6 of 7
[ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ]
 |
| #101 |
12-04-2003 @ 08:23:37 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#96, ricey yeah, but i think we have come to agree that stock isn't so much rice as it is ugly
|
|
| #102 |
12-04-2003 @ 08:24:16 PM |
| Posted By : SuperDave479 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#88, The wings on the Mopars I can stand because they *had* to have a factory equivalent of what was in NASCAR. No matter how much it worked, huge-winged production cars did not stay around.
|
|
| #103 |
12-04-2003 @ 08:25:39 PM |
| Posted By : SuperDave479 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#99, Only because people here love it just because it's a Mustang. That's just blindness. They would thrash any other car like this. That annoys me.
|
|
| #104 |
12-04-2003 @ 08:25:53 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#97, i don't know for sure, but i would think there would be rules outlawing cars with such things, and even if they don't, its still not going to handle as well
|
|
| #105 |
12-04-2003 @ 08:26:34 PM |
| Posted By : solid_snake |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#60, you're speaking as a cheap performance enthusiast not a car enthusiast, they are very different things.
[Edited by solid_snake on 12-04-2003 @ 08:27:42 PM]
|
|
| #107 |
12-04-2003 @ 08:27:44 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#103, Who here really loves it? I believe the general consensus of the site is that, yes, it's an ugly and overpriced car. But it's also a rare and interesting car.
|
|
| #108 |
12-04-2003 @ 08:28:13 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#102, umm so just cause ford doesn't have a factory backed team, doesn't mean they don't have to make a stock version. SCCA isn't NASCAR so not everything is going to be the same
|
|
| #109 |
12-04-2003 @ 08:29:34 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#107, well i do, but i also love the winged mopars (and don't think they are ugly).
|
|
| #110 |
12-04-2003 @ 08:31:05 PM |
| Posted By : Silverbaby |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#91, Well that makes me feel better. I probably should word my posts diferently also.. I'm new so I don't always get things...
|
|
| #113 |
12-04-2003 @ 08:38:10 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
so if the C5R was sold like the R would it be rice too? its wing isn't much better then this
|
|
| #114 |
12-04-2003 @ 08:38:30 PM |
| Posted By : solid_snake |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#112, while not the same I don't like neons or the styling of the SRT-4 but I like the fact that it's a car built with performance in mind
|
|
| #115 |
12-04-2003 @ 08:55:23 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
In terms of purpose-built factory cars, these weren't bad. Still, the way I look at it, it's an awful lot of money to spend for a Mustang, and I can only imagine wanting one if I needed it for some kind of club racing. Personally, if I had that kind of money to blow, I wouldn't trust Ford factory parts to get the job done; I'd just buy a CSR from Kenny Brown.
|
|
| #116 |
12-04-2003 @ 08:58:23 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#81, *remains suspiciously quiet*
I don't like the taillamps, though.
|
|
| #117 |
12-04-2003 @ 09:00:13 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#95, I'd rather wind up in that power/weight ratio class without resorting to forced induction, myself. :-)
|
|
| #119 |
12-04-2003 @ 09:01:02 PM |
| Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#99, Like the ZL-1 Camaros were intended for public use, they only made 69 of them.... Or how about ZL-1 Vette's? Only 2 of them... Or Dodge Superstocks, or COPOs.
|
|
| #120 |
12-04-2003 @ 09:02:33 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#118, If I had to drive something with 4 doors, and had the money...
|
Showing page: 6 of 7
[ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
