|
|
|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
218 |
| Average Score |
3.33 |
| Verdict |
Not Rice
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=25667 |
|
| Comments: 45 (Read/Post) Favorites: 1 (View) |
Submitted
on: 07-25-2003
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
I was behind a new Accord, and thought to myself, "MAN, THAT'S AN UGLY CAR!" |
Showing page: 1 of 3
[ 1 2 3 ]
 |
| #1 |
7-25-2003 @ 10:35:21 AM |
| Posted By : Jurrell |
Reply | Edit | Del |
They're still ulgy, but they started to grow on me. Only if they turned the rear lights upside down, it would look so much better. Too bad they gave us a completely new model than the nice one from japan, dirty bastards.
[Edited by Jurrell on 7-25-2003 @ 10:36:08 AM]
|
|
| #2 |
7-25-2003 @ 10:36:45 AM |
| Posted By : RiceArsonist |
Reply | Edit | Del |
It burns!!! IT BUUUUURNS!!!! This car is seriously fugly...
|
|
| #5 |
7-25-2003 @ 05:59:32 PM |
| Posted By : kstagger |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Honda could take a big piece of shit, put 4 wheels on it, and people will still buy it. Talk about brand loyalty.
|
|
| #9 |
7-26-2003 @ 12:22:28 AM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Also, I wouldn't call it brand loyalty as much as a lemming-like "be trendy even if it means being ugly" behavior.
|
|
| #10 |
7-26-2003 @ 12:26:21 AM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I liked the older version better, especially the coupes.
|
|
| #11 |
7-26-2003 @ 12:28:09 AM |
| Posted By : ricerocketboy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#10, yea
I like the 1994-1997 coupes the best. Then the 1992-1995 Civic hatches. I also like the Honda Pilot. The new Accord? No thanks. The new Civic? Si Hatch, yes. The rest? Sorry.
|
|
| #12 |
7-26-2003 @ 12:30:43 AM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
You like the new Civic hatch with the dick on the dash? (Hey, I didn't make that up!)
|
|
| #14 |
7-26-2003 @ 12:32:21 AM |
| Posted By : ricerocketboy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#12, the shifter is actually kinda cool. My uncle has a new Si. I know the shifter is in a wierd place, but hey, it's better for mountain roads.
|
|
| #15 |
7-26-2003 @ 12:33:50 AM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Mountain roads in a 100hp economy car? You're crazy. It looks pretty awkward to use, having to push the shifter up and down instead of laterally.
|
|
| #17 |
7-26-2003 @ 12:35:28 AM |
| Posted By : ricerocketboy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#15, not 100 hp. More like 200 or so. It's actually pretty fun. We passed several broke down SUVs. We were doing 75 or 80 around turns. Handled pretty well.
|
|
| #18 |
7-26-2003 @ 12:36:35 AM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#16, Sure...I forgot about the WRC drivers who take the stock Civic hatchbacks from the lot straight to the mountains. My mistake.
|
|
| #19 |
7-26-2003 @ 12:38:05 AM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#18, I was referring to the "awkward" shifter design--most of the current generation of WRC cars appear to have dash-mounted sequential shifters--bang the shifter forward to downshift, pull it back to upshift, from what I can tell.
ed: Nice try, though.
[Edited by Lemming on 7-26-2003 @ 12:38:25 AM]
|
Showing page: 1 of 3
[ 1 2 3 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
