|
|
|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=27787 |
|
| Comments: 68 (Read/Post) Favorites: 2 (View) |
Submitted
on: 10-16-2003
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
The next NSX |
Showing page: 3 of 4
[ 1 2 3 4 ]
 |
| #41 |
10-16-2003 @ 11:21:10 PM |
| Posted By : Biohazard |
Reply | Edit | Del |
O joy, this conversation again. :-P
#38, exactly. VERY well worded. I agree with you 100%
For the money, I would much rather have a Lingenfelter Vette. :-)
|
|
| #45 |
10-16-2003 @ 11:29:13 PM |
| Posted By : solid_snake |
Reply | Edit | Del |
If I was to get a MR japanese car it'd be a MR2
If I was to get an overpriced japanese car it'd be a skyline
if I was to get a ~3,000lb car with ~300hp it'd be a modified fox mustang
|
|
| #46 |
10-17-2003 @ 12:29:18 AM |
| Posted By : SuperDave479 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#45, I already have a 3,000 lb car with over 300hp and I only paid 15k (not 90k). If this thing was about 400hp+ it'd be a contender at least. Basically I can kick this car's ass up and down the road and that's just sad considering. But hey, it's a Honda....
|
|
| #52 |
10-17-2003 @ 07:39:32 AM |
| Posted By : kstagger |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#38, the NSXs I've seen racing here at the Grand Rapids Grand Prix (only ran 2 times!) seemed to do pretty damn good... I'm sure they handle well... but for the money, I would sure hate to buy one and then get embarrassed by a Z28 that cost 1/3 as much... sure the NSX costs more, but it isn't good bang for the buck. For the same price, you can buy a nicer car...
|
|
| #53 |
10-17-2003 @ 07:51:54 AM |
| Posted By : cams116 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Now, after a few in depth convos with the 'big boys' over here, its not so much bang for buck for everyone. Like if I was after bang for buck, I would have bought a 73 celica I found with a 1JZ GTE in it... It would kinda be fuckmeoff quick and for $7500 is about half the cost of my car, however, my car is VERY tidy, a 4 door, still quite capable, and still something different. So not everyone is after bang for buck, but more so some form of indvidualism. BUT!!!! rice is still wrong.
*I still want a sleeper*
[Edited by cams116 on 10-17-2003 @ 07:52:54 AM]
|
|
| #55 |
10-17-2003 @ 02:16:16 PM |
| Posted By : thirtyseven |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#38, 8200 rpm is hardly a "low revving" engine, even by Ferrari standards. Before the F355 (8500 rpm) c. 8000 was the standard for Italian supercars. The NSX is not a supercar, it doesnt have enough "soul" I dont believe the Japanese can build a car with enough passion to fit in that category. Also, it may not keep up with superdave's Camaro in a straight line, but I'm sure come the corners it would be a different story.
|
|
| #56 |
10-17-2003 @ 02:25:09 PM |
| Posted By : SuperDave479 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#55, While I agree about the handling part, it should but be able to beat my car in a straight line AND around the corners for 90k.
|
|
| #59 |
10-17-2003 @ 02:33:54 PM |
| Posted By : Biohazard |
Reply | Edit | Del |
These are good cars, I can't deny it. It just that for 90k you can get so much more. Nobody can deny that this car is horribly overpriced and not on par with the real supercars.
|
|
| #60 |
10-17-2003 @ 02:37:32 PM |
| Posted By : thirtyseven |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#59, Thats what I've been saying all along in this thread, it is undoubtedly overpriced. I just have to defend it as a great car, I hate how ricer's have made it so a Honda is automatically overhyped. You can't say anything good about a Honda without everybody telling you its not a Ferrari, or accusing you of being a Ricer.
[Edited by thirtyseven on 10-17-2003 @ 02:38:45 PM]
|
Showing page: 3 of 4
[ 1 2 3 4 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
