|
|
|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
143 |
| Average Score |
2.59 |
| Verdict |
Not Rice
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=31376 |
|
| Comments: 69 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 03-23-2004
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
I want a 2005 Dodge Magnum R/T.
350ci HEMI. Mmmm! |
Showing page: 3 of 4
[ 1 2 3 4 ]
 |
| #41 |
3-23-2004 @ 05:21:08 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Currently online:
musclecarnut711 (Last active 0 minutes ago)
Phantom1 (Last active 0 minutes ago)
DA_MAISTA (Last active 0 minutes ago)
camino83 (Last active 0 minutes ago)
ricerocketboy (Last active 0 minutes ago)
comradesampo (Last active 0 minutes ago)
blue_sica (Last active 0 minutes ago)
MxCx (Last active 1 minutes ago)
Skid (Last active 1 minutes ago)
Jurrell (Last active 2 minutes ago)
stang392 (Last active 2 minutes ago)
solid_snake (Last active 3 minutes ago)
Maybe he's gone off to search for sources?
|
|
| #42 |
3-23-2004 @ 05:23:49 PM |
| Posted By : comradesampo |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Who gives a damn what the 0-60 time is, anyway? It's a station wagon, not a sports car, and a goddamn cool station wagon in my opinion.
|
|
| #44 |
3-23-2004 @ 05:25:28 PM |
| Posted By : MxCx |
Reply | Edit | Del |
One of the dumbest arguments Ive seen in a while... Its a damn wagon and, like comradesampo said, a damn cool one at that.
|
|
| #46 |
3-23-2004 @ 05:27:52 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
OMG, OMG, 0-60 in 6.8 seconds is slow! And it comes standard with tires the same width as the Intrepid! It sucks!
Sounds like some pretty desperate reasons.
|
|
| #51 |
3-23-2004 @ 05:39:48 PM |
| Posted By : StockIsBeautiful |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Skid: Substanciated by what? You haven't provided a single damn source.
Is DODGE.COM credible enough source for you? Go look it up.
And nobody here except SKID and RICEROCKETBOY said that that the car sucks, I only said that it is surprisingly slow for what it is, a 5.7L RWD vehicle.
Now quit drooling and go back to your 'brick', or a bicycle in ricerocketboy's case ;-)
|
|
| #54 |
3-23-2004 @ 05:44:35 PM |
| Posted By : ricerocketboy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#51, oh, and at no point did I, or Skid, say that this car sucks. Learn the facts.
|
|
| #55 |
3-23-2004 @ 05:54:05 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#51, how is that fucking slow for a wagon? he its faster then what my stang was with an AOD. I'm guessing Camaros are some where in the 5s, so one second off is not bad at all when going from a sports car to a family car
|
|
| #56 |
3-23-2004 @ 05:55:03 PM |
| Posted By : MxCx |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Im starting to think StockIsBeautiful = 0wnd
|
|
| #58 |
3-23-2004 @ 05:57:48 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
This thread has made me dumber. 300ish (I'm guessing) HP moving a 4000-lb RWD car to 60 MPH in under 7 seconds isn't bad. It's not mind-blowingly fast by any stretch, but it's a darn big car. Add to that the fact that they probably used a (since this is an automatic, after all) torque converter with a very low stall point, and it's probably not even all that great at launching. It's still adequate performance, though.
I guess one of the key factors will be the price point at which they offer the car, and with what other "features".
|
|
| #59 |
3-23-2004 @ 06:05:20 PM |
| Posted By : Adambomb |
Reply | Edit | Del |
If i had a big family this would be my first choice. hell I'll take one anyway
|
|
| #60 |
3-23-2004 @ 06:08:32 PM |
| Posted By : ricerocketboy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
My first choice , being the car nut that I am, would have to be a GM A body wagon. Preferrably a 1964-1972 Pontiac LeMans/GTO, but yah, I'd definitely take this.
|
Showing page: 3 of 4
[ 1 2 3 4 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
