|
|
|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=35454 |
|
| Comments: 23 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 09-15-2004
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
You know what the call a Dodge Neon in Canada?
-What, they don't call it a Neon?
No man, they call it an SX 2.0.
-An SX 2.0...what do they call the SRT4 then?
Well, an SRT4 is an SRT4, but they call it "Le SRT4". |
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
 |
| #1 |
9-15-2004 @ 02:17:57 PM |
| Posted By : 91TSI |
Reply | Edit | Del |
It doesn't matter what they're called. They suck anyway.
|
|
| #3 |
9-15-2004 @ 02:24:43 PM |
| Posted By : 91TSI |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#2, You don't think so? They aren't that impressive, really.
|
|
| #4 |
9-15-2004 @ 02:31:58 PM |
| Posted By : Dadol21 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#3, Not at all, with under $1000 you can make them 12 second cars.
Edit: And still be under factory warranty.
[Edited by Dadol21 on 9-15-2004 @ 02:32:27 PM]
|
|
| #5 |
9-15-2004 @ 02:35:05 PM |
| Posted By : 91TSI |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I find that really hard to believe that for under a grand. besides, I'm talking stock for stock. You look at an evo 8 or Sti. The evo runs 13's outta the box. I just don't think they're worth it.
(that's the stat's that I've read from a few different places)
[Edited by 91TSI on 9-15-2004 @ 02:36:00 PM]
|
|
| #6 |
9-15-2004 @ 02:37:43 PM |
| Posted By : Dadol21 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
But they cost $10 thousand more. So money for money, the SRT is the better way to go.
|
|
| #7 |
9-15-2004 @ 02:38:57 PM |
| Posted By : 91TSI |
Reply | Edit | Del |
still fwd...
You're right about the money though but I would spend the extra to have a better platform... not saying that evo's are great platforms but you know what I mean.
|
|
| #8 |
9-15-2004 @ 02:39:53 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
The SRT4 is a great deal if you're looking for cheap straight-line speed.
|
|
| #9 |
9-15-2004 @ 02:40:56 PM |
| Posted By : Dadol21 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I know what you mean, I'd rather have an EVO too but the SRT is a good bargain for a decently fast car.
|
|
| #10 |
9-15-2004 @ 02:44:18 PM |
| Posted By : 91TSI |
Reply | Edit | Del |
About 2 months ago I found a 1990 Supra turbo for right in my price range. I was going to sell my talon and buy it because it was it was a much better platform to work with. Then things came up so it didn't happen.
|
|
| #11 |
9-15-2004 @ 02:50:38 PM |
| Posted By : kstagger |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I wish the SRT-4 was AWD, but hey - good bang for the buck
|
|
| #13 |
9-15-2004 @ 04:08:03 PM |
| Posted By : MxCx |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Im still having trouble dealing with the fact that I like a Neon... >_<
|
|
| #14 |
9-15-2004 @ 04:56:08 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Granted that the SRT-4 is FWD, they do handle well. Sort of like the Honda CRX or the original Olds Toronado...you could say that they find away around their handicap.
|
|
| #17 |
9-15-2004 @ 07:04:45 PM |
| Posted By : LordFlux |
Reply | Edit | Del |
These get ragged on a lot because they're Neons, but I'd sport one. I think it'd be a fun car to drive.
|
|
| #18 |
9-15-2004 @ 07:08:43 PM |
| Posted By : DA_MAISTA |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Is there something you can do about those goddamnugly headlights? Anything? Aftermarket, conversion... Anything that would make it less bug-like looking? (And no, Masking tape is NEVER a Solution!)
|
|
| #19 |
9-15-2004 @ 07:16:49 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I'd buy one if I wasn't already "invested" in something else. Don't the very latest ones now come with an LSD to help reduce torquesteer?
|
|
| #20 |
12-16-2004 @ 07:05:36 PM |
| Posted By : Altima35se2003 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#12, i was wrong. i have the dealer book right in front of me. SX 2.0 is now it. SRT4 is a package of the SX 2.0. no mention of neon on it anywhere.
|
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
