|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
Showing page: 2 of 4 [ 1 2 3 4 ]
|
#21 |
9-26-2005 @ 04:58:48 PM |
Posted By : thontor |
Reply | Edit | Del |
weight depends on the year.. anywhere between 2350-2750.. still you didnt answer my question.. that car above capable of a high 14 second quarter?
[Edited by thontor on 9-26-2005 @ 05:02:29 PM] |
|
#22 |
9-26-2005 @ 05:02:09 PM |
Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
puts some better seats in it and I'd rock the shit out of it
oh and replace that can with a flowmaster
[Edited by stang392 on 9-26-2005 @ 05:03:01 PM] |
|
#23 |
9-26-2005 @ 05:03:45 PM |
Posted By : MxCx |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#21, Bone stock, its capable of mid 15s. And this appears to have a modded B18, meaning about 30-40 over stock. Id say its capable. |
|
#25 |
9-26-2005 @ 07:45:53 PM |
Posted By : Muntz05 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Would be close, if it was an 1/8 mile, I think thontor could take him... |
|
#26 |
9-26-2005 @ 08:16:56 PM |
Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I'd lose. :(
Well, mainly because I can't go over 3000 RPM right now... |
|
#27 |
9-27-2005 @ 12:36:46 AM |
Posted By : thontor |
Reply | Edit | Del |
if it runs 13.6 he'd give an LS1 a run for it's money.. but still, stock for stock, a v6 camaro would take a civic si... some have gotten a 5 speed v6 fbody on stock tires to hit 14.9 in the 1/4... mine aint that fast |
|
#29 |
9-27-2005 @ 12:43:29 AM |
Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#27, yeah, a V6 camaro would take that minivan-looking si...not really the older ones, or the brand new ones with 200hp
oh, and i would rock this with tinted headlights
[Edited by ambientFLIER on 9-27-2005 @ 12:44:02 AM] |
|
#31 |
9-27-2005 @ 01:49:53 PM |
Posted By : MxCx |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#25, Doubtful.
#27, No ones arguing stock cars here. |
|
#33 |
9-27-2005 @ 10:21:08 PM |
Posted By : thontor |
Reply | Edit | Del |
i'm sure this car is modified a heck of a lot more than mine, stock for stock i'd say it'd be close, but i think the v6 fbody would come out ahead |
|
#35 |
9-27-2005 @ 10:23:59 PM |
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#32, THat's what always amuses me, to prove thier points, both Grittboys and Riceboys love to compaire cars that can't really be compaired. Forget all this bench racing and sales brochure racing and magazine racing crap, just run what you brung, and when you get beat, shut up and put it on the trailer |
|
#36 |
9-27-2005 @ 10:29:01 PM |
Posted By : ricerocketboy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I'm not trying to shift sides or anything. I can pretty much dig any car if the owner has pride in their car asn doesn't make it out to be something it's not. Be it a quick Civic or a stock Cuda, I'll like it. I like cars that the owners are proud of and go off spouting random e race crap. |
|
#37 |
9-27-2005 @ 10:30:52 PM |
Posted By : RiceArsonist |
Reply | Edit | Del |
None of your cars can compare to my fearsome 98hp Pontiac 6K... A-Body powah! |
|
#38 |
9-27-2005 @ 10:31:32 PM |
Posted By : thontor |
Reply | Edit | Del |
i'm still debating.. do i want to put a lot of work into this car and have something that's for the most part unique? but still not really that quick.. the best i can hope for N/A is probably 13s.. 12s maybe if i spray it.. but i dont know if i'm willing to go through the work
i'm tempted to just sell this car and get something that's quicker out of the box.. |
|
#39 |
9-27-2005 @ 10:33:28 PM |
Posted By : ricerocketboy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#38, do whatever makes you happy. If you wish to keep your V6 and not make it faster, that's you. Personally, I'd do what makes me feel good about my car, not what others think. Sorry if it sounded a little harsh. |
Showing page: 2 of 4 [ 1 2 3 4 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|