|
|
|
|
|
This image has been retired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
1384 |
| Average Score |
3.68 |
| Verdict |
Not Rice
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=479 |
|
| Comments: 21 (Read/Post) Favorites: 2 (View) |
Submitted
on: 01-01-2002
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
2003 Buick Blackhawk - 463 hp, 510 lb-ft of torque... |
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
 |
| #2 |
1-03-2002 @ 03:26:46 AM |
| Posted By : daseansta |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Beautiful car, but will they actually make it? And if so, will they put a detuned engined in it?
|
|
| #3 |
1-03-2002 @ 03:41:30 AM |
| Posted By : thatbluething |
Reply | Edit | Del |
sadly, I think its just a concept, something to show Buick's heritage or whatever
|
|
| #6 |
1-13-2002 @ 10:11:29 AM |
| Posted By : scarfa21 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I saw this car at the buick nats, it beautiful, it went mid 13's, the one time it went down the track.
|
|
| #7 |
1-25-2002 @ 04:01:43 AM |
| Posted By : 500plus |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Great gobs of torque in the Buick tradition. Sweet car!
|
|
| #8 |
2-19-2002 @ 05:33:20 AM |
| Posted By : Jesuz |
Reply | Edit | Del |
it's a bit too high off the ground...and it doesnt have that 30's 40's look for some reason...ammm..may be is the front and rear end
|
|
| #9 |
3-06-2002 @ 07:03:33 PM |
| Posted By : rolla_corrolla |
Reply | Edit | Del |
You know, I really like this car. But, for some reason all I can think of is Silly Puddy when I look at it?
|
|
| #10 |
3-07-2002 @ 04:32:05 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
People complain whenever they see this car...because GM used a 1970 vintage engine in it. Screw those lamers! I can't believe people still complain when a car uses pushrods, even though they can plainly see that the car runs like (as DiRF would say) greased shit on a grill.
|
|
| #11 |
3-07-2002 @ 04:33:46 PM |
| Posted By : Mad Max |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Y'know, who gives a rat's patoot how it lifts the valves? If it's fast, it's fast. Why are overhead cams "better" than a pushrod engine? If it makes the same power, I say the pushrod motor's just as good.
|
|
| #12 |
3-07-2002 @ 04:36:10 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Funny thing is, pushrods make more low end torque. But people complain because they aren't as smooth. Whata buncha pansies! Especially for performance cars!
|
|
| #13 |
3-07-2002 @ 04:39:30 PM |
| Posted By : Mad Max |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Look, if you're buying a car like this and you're worried about an infinitesimal loss of smoothness, you are officially a Mad Max-certified nancy boy.
|
|
| #14 |
3-19-2002 @ 09:53:35 PM |
| Posted By : CRXtrackguy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
does anyone else see some willis influences in this car? maybe a hint of Tucker?
|
|
| #15 |
4-19-2002 @ 11:10:21 PM |
| Posted By : Lebo |
Reply | Edit | Del |
oh how I wish they'd put this into production, even if it was limited...just like when you see a Prowler fly by, you can't help but look...you don't see em everyday
|
|
| #16 |
7-29-2002 @ 06:02:39 AM |
| Posted By : cams116 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Ricecops quote of the week goes to mad max with this gem. 'if you're buying a car like this and you're worried about an infinitesimal loss of smoothness, you are officially a Mad Max-certified nancy boy'. Classic. Keep it up max.
|
|
| #17 |
7-29-2002 @ 09:00:59 AM |
| Posted By : Wingnut |
Reply | Edit | Del |
This car looks too good, it will never see production from GM.
|
|
| #18 |
7-29-2002 @ 09:03:01 AM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Yeah it does!!! (They'd never make anything this sweet looking)
[Edited by mr_mcmunkee on 7-29-2002 @ 09:03:39 AM]
|
|
| #19 |
8-26-2002 @ 08:44:39 PM |
| Posted By : VonChad |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I don't want to ask because I suspect I know the answer... but it's not gonna happen, is it?
|
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
