|
|
|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=59768 |
|
| Comments: 21 (Read/Post) Favorites: 2 (View) |
Submitted
on: 01-20-2007
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
The "F-bomb" belongs to David Freiburger, Cheif Editor of Hotrod Magazine. This is David's personal car which we built completely at Nelson Supercars to show what can be done with a high tech twin turbo Nelson Racing Engine... and a car designed around it. The 1973 Camaro has been caged, minitubbed, completely stripped to bare metal and powder coated the entire car. The motor is a 406 twin turbo that makes 1540 hp and 1527 lbs of torque. The F-Bomb was debuted at the 2006 SEMA (Specialty Equipment Market Association) trade show. |
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
 |
| #5 |
1-20-2007 @ 08:59:47 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
David Freiburger fucking rocks. Technicaly brilliant, slightly demented, and all with the same sense of style as StillRuns.
|
|
| #7 |
1-21-2007 @ 05:59:09 AM |
| Posted By : MxCx |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#6, Slander.
Maybe not lies and slander, but slander, none the less.
|
|
| #8 |
1-21-2007 @ 07:50:14 AM |
| Posted By : Sensekhmet |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#7, Show me this thing going flat out around a race track and I'll retract my statement. As long as it doesn't get airborne and crash&burn on the first corner that is.
|
|
| #10 |
1-21-2007 @ 08:00:26 AM |
| Posted By : Sensekhmet |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#9, I did. Language barrier made me misunderstand it perhaps. Could you explain?
|
|
| #11 |
1-21-2007 @ 08:04:44 AM |
| Posted By : MxCx |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#10, Lies are obvious. Slander is just something negative said about something. I called your post slanderous, which it is, but I admitted it wasnt a lie :P
|
|
| #12 |
1-21-2007 @ 08:08:28 AM |
| Posted By : Sensekhmet |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#11, I understood so much but I don't get the negative part... isn't what I said true? There's no way the potential of this thing is ever going to be fully utilised... which IMO is in no small part beacause of the fact that the car itself can't utilise all that power.
|
|
| #13 |
1-21-2007 @ 09:28:45 AM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#11, Your definition is not technically correct, especially in a legal setting. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/slander
It's only slander if it's untrue. Also, since one could argue that the Internet is more like a print medium, so untrue statements on the Internet would be closer to libel than slander.
edit: And I agree that there's virtually no way to get all that power down, unless the primary use involves drag slicks and a road surface coated with traction compound. :p
[Edited by Lemming on 1-21-2007 @ 09:36:03 AM]
|
|
| #15 |
1-21-2007 @ 12:19:18 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
And that is libel. I do not, in fact, turn tricks for money.
|
|
| #17 |
7-06-2009 @ 03:10:49 AM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#6, Not only is it an occasional driver (in Los Angeles traffic, no less), but you can go to YouTube and see plenty of videos of it in action. Trust me, while it might not be a practical performance vehicle, it's definitely NOT a show car.
#16, Destroyed when?
|
|
| #18 |
7-06-2009 @ 03:21:25 AM |
| Posted By : ricerocketboy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#17, in the fourth fast and furious it was run into something at the end of the movie.
|
|
| #20 |
7-06-2009 @ 10:28:17 AM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#19, Aye, they built about four or five replicas of F-bomb for the film. In fact, I think the real car was only used for one static shot.
|
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
