|
|
|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=10388 |
|
| Comments: 103 (Read/Post) Favorites: 3 (View) |
Submitted
on: 09-03-2002
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
The RSX. The name is an abbreviation for "Really SuX". Man, these things are ugly, looks like a Toyota Echo from this view almost. |
Showing page: 4 of 6
[ 1 2 3 4 5 6 ]
 |
| #62 |
6-22-2003 @ 12:25:50 AM |
| Posted By : Kakoriat |
Reply | Edit | Del |
*waits for mcmukee's comment about the DSM blowing up after the 1st pass*
|
|
| #63 |
8-14-2003 @ 02:07:20 PM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#59, "just b/c we all know you can go faster for less money doesn't mean that's everyone’s goal."
So, some people actually prefer to waste money rebuilding puny engines after blowing them while trying to squeeze out power that they could've gotten by purchasing a REAL car in stock form? Interesting concept...for me to poop on.
I just read this thread, and those "import enthusiasts" are hilarious when they try to talk about how the Japs are superior.
|
|
| #64 |
1-13-2004 @ 11:34:38 AM |
| Posted By : MxCx |
Reply | Edit | Del |
RSX is just fine with me. Lil on the pricey side, which means Ill probably never own one, but I wouldnt mind having one if money was no issue.
Ok, my comments on the argument- some cars are built for straight line and some for the curves. In most situations, the straight-liners suck at the curves and the ones that are good in the curves suck in the straight line. Some people want to go really fast in a straight line, some want to go as fast as they can while actually driving. I, for one, like turning, though flying down the straight line wouldnt be too bad. Just about everyone in this argument was completely biased one way or the other, and thus ruined the entire argument.
Oh and Obsidian, what is the meaning of "pushing a rope?"
|
|
| #66 |
1-13-2004 @ 11:36:52 AM |
| Posted By : MxCx |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#65, Every car has its weaknesses and thats one of the RSX's.
|
|
| #67 |
1-13-2004 @ 11:59:34 AM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#65, i doubt it was purposely built to burn a lot of oil...i heard they do as a side effect of high compression
[Edited by ambientFLIER on 1-13-2004 @ 12:01:12 PM]
|
|
| #68 |
1-13-2004 @ 12:01:36 PM |
| Posted By : MxCx |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#67, *obviously* Why would a company (ANY company) purposely build a shitty engine? (I know this swings the door wide open for the anti-Honda comments but dont start, its just a bunch of biased bs)
|
|
| #70 |
1-13-2004 @ 12:04:31 PM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#68, AHA, it's not honda, it's acura *door is open for honda = teh acura comments*
|
|
| #71 |
1-13-2004 @ 03:10:24 PM |
| Posted By : camino83 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#68, & #70, acura = top line hondas. if you treat the car as well as you can, sure it'll last. but they're made to be disposable so its just a gay argument without purpose really. good for lasting as long as most people keep them (less than 5 years) on average.
|
|
| #72 |
1-13-2004 @ 03:22:42 PM |
| Posted By : MxCx |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#71, Thats what a lot of new cars are made for.
|
|
| #73 |
3-28-2004 @ 05:15:19 AM |
| Posted By : Altima35se2003 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
that is why i like the altima, reasonable at both. decent straight stock, 16 (auto) and great handling for fwd
|
|
| #74 |
4-22-2004 @ 02:32:15 AM |
| Posted By : MxCx |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Too bad the interior falls apart :- I know I say this a lot, but I dont miss the arguments with mcmunkee and Obsidian. Both are about as biased as the KKK. Just.. differently.. yeah.
|
|
| #75 |
4-22-2004 @ 02:36:14 AM |
| Posted By : Biohazard |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#74, neither of them post here very much anymore though. Especially mcmunkee.
|
|
| #76 |
4-22-2004 @ 02:37:06 AM |
| Posted By : Biohazard |
Reply | Edit | Del |
same with ambient too. Not that Im complaining about any of them not posting here really.....
[Edited by Biohazard on 4-22-2004 @ 02:38:44 AM]
|
|
| #77 |
4-22-2004 @ 02:44:14 AM |
| Posted By : MxCx |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#76, ambient never really bothered me.. just that one time with the NSX where he was the one defending it :P (odd cuz I was still a bit of a Honda fanboy)
|
|
| #78 |
4-22-2004 @ 02:54:19 AM |
| Posted By : Biohazard |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#77, The main thing about him that bugged me was his constant support of ugly FWD cars and his constantly posting 3 or more comments in a row on one picture that could have just as easily been put in one comment. Its an obvious attempt to bring attention to a picture on which he wants to make a dumb point.
|
|
| #79 |
4-22-2004 @ 03:05:29 AM |
| Posted By : MxCx |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I didnt necessarily disagree with him on a lot of stuff... I think FWD can be made to handle just as well as almost anything else, but at a MUCH greater cost.
|
|
| #80 |
4-22-2004 @ 03:05:47 AM |
| Posted By : Biohazard |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#19, HAHAHAHAHAHA. I love that comment. What an sad load of horse excrement.
|
Showing page: 4 of 6
[ 1 2 3 4 5 6 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
