|
|
|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=10388 |
|
| Comments: 103 (Read/Post) Favorites: 3 (View) |
Submitted
on: 09-03-2002
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
The RSX. The name is an abbreviation for "Really SuX". Man, these things are ugly, looks like a Toyota Echo from this view almost. |
Showing page: 1 of 6
[ 1 2 3 4 5 6 ]
 |
| #2 |
9-03-2002 @ 01:58:22 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I can't really see why so many people seem to like these. To me, they just look like a more expensive Civic.
|
|
| #4 |
9-03-2002 @ 02:18:00 PM |
| Posted By : WhtHotZ28 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
They like it because it has 6 spd, 200hp and 142tq for $25,000. Not knowing the for the same amount could get them a 6 spd, 310hp 340tq Camaro Z28.
|
|
| #7 |
9-25-2002 @ 01:22:53 AM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
it looks allright to me...plus its an acura, which will have a very strong resale value later on...plus they are realible
|
|
| #9 |
9-25-2002 @ 01:25:13 AM |
| Posted By : cams116 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
You jokeing or not, because most of the time I can never tell.
|
|
| #10 |
9-25-2002 @ 01:29:45 AM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
im not joking...2 of my friends inherited integras from their dads as the first car...one is 200k miles and the other a little over 90k...they run nice as hell, and have good quality
|
|
| #13 |
2-09-2003 @ 07:41:27 PM |
| Posted By : CRXtrackguy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
You get a lot for your money with these. Not as much as you do with a WRX, but hey, whatever floats your boat.
|
|
| #15 |
2-09-2003 @ 07:49:28 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#14, I, for one would rather have a bubble butt Capri than one of these. Not a Honda fan.
|
|
| #17 |
2-09-2003 @ 07:52:41 PM |
| Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
This is a sad case IMHO of a car that's great on paper, has impressive numbers, but it's sooooo ugly that I'd never own one, I would just not love it like I love my much, much slower F-body
|
|
| #18 |
2-09-2003 @ 07:55:53 PM |
| Posted By : CRXtrackguy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
In their defense, (having taken a mate of mine around an AutoX course in his) this little car has some of the best transitory balance I've ever seen in a stock FWD car, and that little 2-liter sounds about as un-Honda as you can get. I don't think I'd buy one, myself, but they are certainly not bad. They're just not world beaters. I know I'm out of place (a road racer in a world of draggers) but that's my opinion.
Keep in mind this is the guy that would take a 327 Camaro over one with a 454. I'm just a little bit off.
|
|
| #19 |
3-20-2003 @ 11:14:54 PM |
| Posted By : UFO2020 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Camaros are so old fashioned though, who wants one of those. I mean think about it: Chevy... Acura... the choice is clear. Camaros are so outdated and clumsy, the only good thing is the unreliable engine... oh, that's right it's not good. Get with the times and buy a reliable sport/luxury import. The RSX is a great car. Get low insurance rates from a car that actually has good handling characteristics, and you gotta love those deluxe taillights, only something a company with good work ethic and innovation can produce. When was the last time a domestic car maker innovated something and was actually up with the modern trends, and when was the last time they were reliable and looked good? That's right, never. Domestic car companies and their fans are stuck in the 60's, still trying to grasp the concept of a well designed and built compact car. When the likes of Nissan, Honda, and Toyota take over 90% of the US market share, maybe they'll wake up and start producing practical vehicles.
|
Showing page: 1 of 6
[ 1 2 3 4 5 6 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
