Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 53141   By: DiRF   Comment: "Those colored tires never got any traction on the ..."
Car: 46608   By: DiRF   Comment: "A silver 550 in NYC brings to mind Nic Cage's "The..."
Car: 92734   By: DiRF   Comment: "Its reputation in the years since, the 500X, and i..."
Car: 98688   By: Skid   Comment: "Weird side marker lights, definitely not factory...."
Car: 94316   By: Adambomb   Comment: "Weight reduction, yo..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

0 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password


View this image at full size
Click here to let us know if the image above is broken.


Go back and vote on this image.

Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=10388
Submitted by: mr_mcmunkee
Comments: 103  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 3  (View)
Submitted on: 09-03-2002
View Stats Category: Car
Description:
The RSX. The name is an abbreviation for "Really SuX". Man, these things are ugly, looks like a Toyota Echo from this view almost.


   Comments

Showing page: 3 of 6
[
1 2 3 4 5 6 ]

#41
3-21-2003 @ 12:32:17 AM
Posted By : ambientFLIER Reply | Edit | Del
smooth out the hedlights and it would be REAL nice

#42
3-21-2003 @ 12:34:18 AM
Posted By : ambientFLIER Reply | Edit | Del
http://images.cardomain.com/member_...4954_3_full.jpg --> blacked-out headlights

#43
3-21-2003 @ 10:15:47 AM
Posted By : kstagger Reply | Edit | Del
CAFE laws enacted in the early 70s have increased the number of compact cars... the increase of smaller cars has increased the number of traffic deaths... how many? Estimates put the deaths at 50,000 - all to save a bit more gasoline.

All of my cars I drive weigh over 3300pds w/o driver - why? Bigger is better! More room to haul people and baby stuff. More luggage space, better ride on our cruddy michigan roads. I still get 29mpg with my buick on the highway... from a 'lowtech' 3.8L pushrod v6 engine... I only spin about
1600 rpm on the highway...!

Do we still live in the 60s? I think we look at that era with fond memories, when you could walk into a dealership and pick up a great car for low $$$... powerful engine, great design, and rubber ripping torque... I love my 80s monte carlo because it feels so much like my old '68 firebird... though it has been updated a bit more (power windows and a better suspension).

whew...I'm done.


#44
3-21-2003 @ 02:38:31 PM
Posted By : Obsidian Reply | Edit | Del
#43, i would say that the CAFE laws you speak of could be atribuited to the poor high speed handling of front wheel drive car.

btw - practally runing idle speeds on the highway rule! I never expected to run at 1500 rpm's while moving at 100kph!


#45
6-21-2003 @ 09:04:49 PM
Posted By : Kakoriat Reply | Edit | Del
The Type-S can reach mid-low 14's with minor bolt-ons and a good driver. Not bad cars but you can go a lot faster for less money, but not everyone wants to do that.

#46
6-21-2003 @ 09:05:40 PM
Posted By : Bling24 Reply | Edit | Del
#45, I like them

#47
6-21-2003 @ 09:07:26 PM
Posted By : fordtacomaz Reply | Edit | Del
#45, a Ford Lightning can got mid 13s stock. and its a truck

#48
6-21-2003 @ 09:08:41 PM
Posted By : Bling24 Reply | Edit | Del
#47, V8 supercharged POWA somethin this car doesnt have another thing this car doesnt have is those fugly altezzas

#49
6-21-2003 @ 09:09:12 PM
Posted By : solid_snake Reply | Edit | Del
due to my not having much money when I get a second car it'll be one that I can make faster cheap

#50
6-21-2003 @ 09:10:29 PM
Posted By : solid_snake Reply | Edit | Del
#48, I'd also hope it's not as hevey as the lightning and it probably has better aerodynamics

#51
6-21-2003 @ 09:17:01 PM
Posted By : fordtacomaz Reply | Edit | Del
#48, oh...sorry. my dad's truck can get low to mid 15s in his Tacoma. STOCK

[Edited by fordtacomaz on 6-21-2003 @ 09:17:20 PM]


#52
6-21-2003 @ 09:24:37 PM
Posted By : solid_snake Reply | Edit | Del
#43, that's one of the reasons SUVs have become so popular (not reffering to the bigger is better remark) If I had to choose between a minivan, a wagon and an SUV, I'd take the SUV why? RWD and a V8 (with a couple of AWD wagon exceptions :) )

#53
6-21-2003 @ 09:29:14 PM
Posted By : fordtacomaz Reply | Edit | Del
#52, S4 Avant=major w00ting!!!

#54
6-21-2003 @ 09:33:38 PM
Posted By : kstagger Reply | Edit | Del
#52, I like my V8 mountaineer...! power, AWD, good ride height... fast bugger too

#55
6-21-2003 @ 09:41:11 PM
Posted By : stang392 Reply | Edit | Del
#52, i'ld take a any of the last RWD wagons and swap in a mild v8

#56
6-21-2003 @ 09:43:20 PM
Posted By : kstagger Reply | Edit | Del
#55, I want to build a 1978 malibu station wagon with a nice 383 stroker... you know, for the wife to drive. Mebbe someday.

#57
6-21-2003 @ 09:46:45 PM
Posted By : Jesuz Reply | Edit | Del
#56, that'd be nice...there is a few mint malibu wagons around my area

#58
6-21-2003 @ 09:49:29 PM
Posted By : stang392 Reply | Edit | Del
or if i had some money to blow, do a RWD conversion to a 83 cavy wagon

#59
6-22-2003 @ 12:22:16 AM
Posted By : Kakoriat Reply | Edit | Del
#47, That's still comparing apples and oranges, one is a high strung 4-cyclinder sport compact, the other is a supercharger V8 sport truck. If we wanna talk about cheap speed then I could take a good condition 90-92 DSM AWD, put about $1000 into it and be running high 12's all day long. Or even better(but more expensive) you could get a 03 Cobra, do a full exhaust, intake, chip and a new pulley, about $1000 in stuff. That combo has proven to take the cars from 390 flywheel to 450 RWHP and high 11's, pretty impressive as well. I guess what I'm getting at is the RSX is probably a fun commuters car, decent gas mileage and pretty quick, just b/c we all know you can go faster for less money doesn't mean that's everyone’s goal.

#60
6-22-2003 @ 12:23:42 AM
Posted By : solid_snake Reply | Edit | Del
#59, yeah but apple kicks orange's ass anyday :P

Showing page: 3 of 6
[
1 2 3 4 5 6 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Saturday, May 18, 2024 11:41:49 PM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.