|
|
|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
326 |
| Average Score |
3.53 |
| Verdict |
Not Rice
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=15511 |
|
| Comments: 35 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 12-03-2002
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
2004 Mustang leaked? These pictures are rumored to be leaked from Ford. |
Showing page: 2 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
 |
| #22 |
12-03-2002 @ 08:34:52 PM |
| Posted By : blackcat77 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Compare this to the Chevy Bel Air show car. Body shape is almost identical.
|
|
| #25 |
12-03-2002 @ 10:40:59 PM |
| Posted By : WhtHotZ28 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
The stock GT will only have 280hp. I guess with no competition Ford sees no need to make it fast. My '94 Z28 came stock with 275hp, but who leaves them stock.
Imagine the look on a new Wustang's owner face when a 8 year old Chevy beats him! I know the Cobra has more power, but Ford had to add a supercharger to get the same power as a Corvette Z06, naturally asperated.
|
|
| #26 |
12-03-2002 @ 10:51:58 PM |
| Posted By : CommieChris |
Reply | Edit | Del |
-sigh- The rear's horrid. I don't really mind the body shape, but those tail lights... wow... It looks like someone bred a Corvette an 80's land barge.
|
|
| #27 |
12-03-2002 @ 10:57:26 PM |
| Posted By : CRXtrackguy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#25, I've said it before, I've said it a million times. SVT didn't have as much displacement to work with.
|
|
| #28 |
12-03-2002 @ 11:54:23 PM |
| Posted By : speedkills |
Reply | Edit | Del |
looks like a supra backend...sort of. I really like the side shot for some reason though *shrugs*
|
|
| #30 |
12-04-2002 @ 08:47:03 AM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#25, Never mind that GM had another 70ci, and the 4.6 is relatively young.
|
|
| #33 |
12-14-2002 @ 11:17:03 PM |
| Posted By : SuperDave479 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#30, Please. *rollseyes* That is a copout. If they can't compete with that size, then they need to make it bigger.
[Edited by SuperDave479 on 12-14-2002 @ 11:17:23 PM]
|
|
| #34 |
12-18-2002 @ 04:14:02 PM |
| Posted By : Big Block |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#33, but then it wouldnt be as fuel or cost efficient,,, sure i believe in the saying "there's no replacement for displacement", but in this case, SVT did the right thing
|
Showing page: 2 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
