|
|
|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=24937 |
|
| Comments: 33 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 07-07-2003
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
exterior of that 12 second eclipse... |
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
 |
| #2 |
7-07-2003 @ 02:59:19 PM |
| Posted By : MaxSE |
Reply | Edit | Del |
yes, that is a gay wing on the hatch... but the car is RWD, so i mean, it needs it? lol, otherwise the car is very not rice, and very clean... thank god, def. do love the color tho...
|
|
| #4 |
7-07-2003 @ 03:00:53 PM |
| Posted By : MaxSE |
Reply | Edit | Del |
this car was originally AWD, and they made it RWD...so i mean, maybe the wing can be justified
you gotta admit too, that for a bodykit, on an eclipse, taht front bumper is VERY nice
[Edited by MaxSE on 7-07-2003 @ 03:02:59 PM]
|
|
| #6 |
7-07-2003 @ 03:13:48 PM |
| Posted By : MaxSE |
Reply | Edit | Del |
ohhh mannnn, i reached my daily picture submission limit! i have lots more too!!!!! (88 pis total, not like id post all of em, but i still got maybe 10 left i really wanna show)
|
|
| #8 |
7-08-2003 @ 08:21:31 AM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Even on a RWD car, one of those 4 foot tall airplane wings still cannot be justified unless he's going to be pushing 200 MPH or so. It's just overkill. Until you get up to the performance of a Viper or Cobra R, it's just not necessary.
|
|
| #9 |
7-08-2003 @ 08:39:31 AM |
| Posted By : solid_snake |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#8, You better call the JGTC (i think that's it) and tell them their spoilers aren't justified
|
|
| #10 |
7-08-2003 @ 01:14:26 PM |
| Posted By : Kakoriat |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Why would someone disconnect the AWD in a DSM to make it RWD? That's just doesn't seem very smart. Honestly I'm not going to believe that until I see pictures, besides with all that power going to the rear end instead of being split to the front, it's going to break something FAST.
|
|
| #11 |
7-08-2003 @ 01:17:10 PM |
| Posted By : kstagger |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#10, hmm... rear weight transfer is the only reason I could think of... but anything above 11secs, I would probably keep the AWD.
|
|
| #12 |
7-08-2003 @ 01:18:03 PM |
| Posted By : solid_snake |
Reply | Edit | Del |
once you get so fast AWD is more of a hinderence that a help, not 12s though
|
|
| #13 |
7-08-2003 @ 01:22:11 PM |
| Posted By : Kakoriat |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#11, If you where going to go for a pure 1/4 mile race car, then it would be obvious. Quickest 4G63 powered car has the engine turned 90 degrees and runs it to huge rear slicks. I just don't see the point in this car.
|
|
| #15 |
7-22-2003 @ 01:43:31 AM |
| Posted By : Adambomb |
Reply | Edit | Del |
*nothing*
[Edited by Adambomb on 7-22-2003 @ 01:44:19 AM]
|
|
| #16 |
2-29-2004 @ 06:35:33 PM |
| Posted By : comradesampo |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#9, JGTC cars are pushing 500hp, which would qualify as "up to the performance of a Viper or Cobra R" (and beyond if you consider the weight reduction, slicks, and aerodynamics.)
|
|
| #17 |
6-26-2004 @ 02:13:52 AM |
| Posted By : N0ob |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Is that a Focus ZX3 in the background? ack! ZX5's are better, like mine.
|
|
| #19 |
6-26-2004 @ 02:24:21 AM |
| Posted By : N0ob |
Reply | Edit | Del |
whatever. I have a ZX5 because I don't want friends climbing over the seats (dirt) and I know that they fold down.
|
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
