|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
Showing page: 1 of 1 [ 1 ]
|
#3 |
3-04-2007 @ 08:12:01 PM |
Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I'm not a huge fan of the color or the front bumper modification, but at least he tried to make it suitable for OT use. Shame that it's a low-buck build with a leaf spring rear suspension, though. |
|
#4 |
3-04-2007 @ 08:12:23 PM |
Posted By : Adambomb |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#2, Yes, because it's a Mustang II it automaticlly sucks, no way in hell to make one fast *rolls eyes* |
|
#6 |
3-04-2007 @ 08:19:15 PM |
Posted By : Adambomb |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#5, Ok sorry, just thought it was more mindless Mustang II bashing as many people like to do. (not only here) |
|
#7 |
3-04-2007 @ 08:19:57 PM |
Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#3, Plenty can be done on leaf springs, though. |
|
#9 |
3-04-2007 @ 08:54:09 PM |
Posted By : Subourbon187 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Wah wah wah, the Mustang 2 wasn't the prettiest thing on the road I know but I just can't complain about this one. It's a nicely built cruiser with reasonable numbers and it doesn't hurt that it looks damn good. I like my high dollar builds with ridiculous horsepower and torque numbers but I enjoy a low buck build just as much if not more. |
|
#10 |
3-04-2007 @ 08:57:58 PM |
Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#7, But there are lots of "tricks" you can do with a link-based suspension that makes such a setup preferable for most applications.
If it works, it works, but it's hard to imagine a car that doesn't have plenty of traction on R-compound tires. :p |
|
#11 |
3-04-2007 @ 09:02:23 PM |
Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#10, No doubt a multilink is better, I'm just saying leafs (leaves?) aren't the end of the world or anything.
[Edited by Skid on 3-04-2007 @ 09:02:53 PM] |
|
#12 |
3-04-2007 @ 09:05:04 PM |
Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#11, They're not, but I like good axle location and lots of antisquat.
OTOH, I can't think of a single factory domestic linked solid axle suspension that actually offers both of those characteristics (especially, nothing contemporary with the Pintostang). Heck, certainly nothing Fox-based.
[Edited by Lemming on 3-04-2007 @ 09:05:55 PM] |
|
#13 |
3-04-2007 @ 11:55:12 PM |
Posted By : 89Rettagt |
Reply | Edit | Del |
not that impressive. KYB GR2's are woefully soft, especially for track use. |
Showing page: 1 of 1 [ 1 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|