|
|
|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=18679 |
|
| Comments: 189 (Read/Post) Favorites: 1 (View) |
Submitted
on: 02-10-2003
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Vehicle Misc |
|
|
Description:
97 Escort LX/Sport engine: SOHC 2.0L SPI, 5-speed Manual, HP: 147,
Weight: 2,400lbs, 0-60: 7.70 sec, 1/4 mile: 15.80 s @ 86.8 mph , top speed:
127 mph
|
Showing page: 6 of 10
[ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ]
 |
| #101 |
2-10-2003 @ 02:46:17 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#100, but FWD burnouts still suck, nothing is going to change that. and i didn't say it was rice, it got a 2 from me
|
|
| #102 |
2-10-2003 @ 02:49:05 PM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
why dont you compare FWD burnouts to pickup truck burnouts? both are caused by a lack of traction...therefore, pickup truck burnouts SUCK
|
|
| #103 |
2-10-2003 @ 02:50:27 PM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
So you'd calling a HEMI Ram doing a burnout pathetic? Truck burnouts can be really impressive. FWD ones are just weak.
[Edited by mr_mcmunkee on 2-10-2003 @ 02:50:39 PM]
|
|
| #106 |
2-10-2003 @ 02:52:03 PM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#103 so you would call a NORTHSTAR Cadillac doing a burnout pathetic? thats what, like 300 lb-ft?
|
|
| #108 |
2-10-2003 @ 02:53:48 PM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
i thought you guys hated fwd burnouts because they are caused by a lack of traction, and are very easy to do...and NOT by your bias against fwd
|
|
| #110 |
2-10-2003 @ 02:55:01 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#106, yep i would, hell my moms car can do a nice FWD burnout, but i still think its pathetic
|
|
| #112 |
2-10-2003 @ 02:55:54 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#108, Lack of traction? FWD cars have most of their weight over the drive wheels.
I hate FWD burnouts because they look stupid.
|
|
| #113 |
2-10-2003 @ 02:56:58 PM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#112 lack of traction when accelerating, making it easy to burn out
[Edited by ambientFLIER on 2-10-2003 @ 02:57:28 PM]
|
|
| #115 |
2-10-2003 @ 02:57:40 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#112, they still have traction problems, thats why FWD drag cars still use wheelie bars
|
|
| #116 |
2-10-2003 @ 02:57:55 PM |
| Posted By : kstagger |
Reply | Edit | Del |
well - the lack of traction idea comes mostly from drag racing, not day to day driving.
|
|
| #117 |
2-10-2003 @ 03:00:20 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#116, not really, if you stomp on it in my moms car it will not hook up at all unless you have traction control on
[Edited by stang392 on 2-10-2003 @ 03:03:14 PM]
|
|
| #118 |
2-10-2003 @ 03:00:31 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Yes, but burnouts are done stationary or right when the car is first beginning to move. Thus the weight doesn't transfer until AFTER the tires break loose.
|
|
| #119 |
2-10-2003 @ 03:01:14 PM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#117 so it wont stop unless traction controll is on? damn...thats not safe at all
[Edited by ambientFLIER on 2-10-2003 @ 03:02:02 PM]
|
Showing page: 6 of 10
[ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
