|
|
|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
10 |
| Average Score |
1.00 |
| Verdict |
Not Rice
|
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
 |
| #1 |
1-15-2008 @ 12:44:32 AM |
| Posted By : Subourbon187 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Thanks GTO/Monaro bashers! Now we have a blander looking sedan with a V6 option!
|
|
| #3 |
1-15-2008 @ 12:47:55 AM |
| Posted By : Subourbon187 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#2, Didn't help the Charger! Oooooh, I'm bitter tonight, I better chill...
|
|
| #5 |
1-15-2008 @ 12:54:36 AM |
| Posted By : Driven_out |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I absolutely love how this thing looks but i love simple designs
|
|
| #6 |
1-15-2008 @ 12:58:47 AM |
| Posted By : Subourbon187 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I shouldn't bash the design too hard, it's easily the best looking Pontiac (not including the Solstice or last gen GTO) in over a decade. I like the hard lines and the well balanced features of the front end. The rear end leaves a bit to be desired but one thing I can say for sure is that it doesn't look quite right with 4 doors.
|
|
| #7 |
1-15-2008 @ 01:44:50 AM |
| Posted By : Altima35se2003 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
It's like a G6 fucked an 2007 altima and a heriditary V8 gene came out too!
|
|
| #8 |
1-15-2008 @ 07:40:20 AM |
| Posted By : kstagger |
Reply | Edit | Del |
its not bad... I would sport it - is this an all new platform or Monaro (er Aussie) based?
|
|
| #10 |
1-15-2008 @ 02:59:04 PM |
| Posted By : Tastycakemix |
Reply | Edit | Del |
A huge 6.0L with only 362 hp is pathetic in my opinion. I hope this means its more fuel efficient. Yea, it has potential but sheese.
In a car that weights 3950 lbs, you're not going to be haulin.
|
|
| #11 |
1-15-2008 @ 03:43:52 PM |
| Posted By : kstagger |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#10, should be rather torquey - better than a 170hp 305 in a same weight caprice!
|
|
| #12 |
1-15-2008 @ 03:50:32 PM |
| Posted By : Sensekhmet |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#10, Jesus. GM should've just ordered a low pressure biturbo V6 from some european company.
|
|
| #13 |
1-15-2008 @ 04:23:14 PM |
| Posted By : Subourbon187 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#10, It's actually a downgrade of power from the 6.0L in the 05+ GTO, and it makes less power at higher rpm. It does match the torque though, but it weighs 200 lbs more.
|
|
| #15 |
1-15-2008 @ 07:05:39 PM |
| Posted By : Adambomb |
Reply | Edit | Del |
OH NOES WE DON'T WANTS NO RWD SEDAN!!!11111 BLANDUGLYLOLOLOL.OLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!11111111
|
|
| #16 |
1-15-2008 @ 07:12:59 PM |
| Posted By : Adambomb |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#10, Admidtly (sp), 2 tons is a bit heavy, but I world hardly consider 362 HP pathetic (unless in a Terex Titan or something :P)
It's like a 137 HP Geo Metro.
|
|
| #18 |
1-15-2008 @ 09:54:10 PM |
| Posted By : Edaw 0 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I just cant wait for the ST Ute.
fixt.
[Edited by Edaw 0 on 1-15-2008 @ 09:54:30 PM]
|
|
| #19 |
1-15-2008 @ 10:38:00 PM |
| Posted By : Driven_out |
Reply | Edit | Del |
if the G8ST does indeed come over, I'm definately getting my paws on one of those.
|
|
| #20 |
5-05-2009 @ 08:12:20 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#10, If by "huge" you mean in mass, you're incorrect. Over 350 horsepower from an engine that's physically smaller than many 4 cylinders and weighs about 500 pounds with the gearbox attached is pretty damn good.
|
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
View Stats
