|
|
|
|
|
This image has been retired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
728 |
| Average Score |
6.61 |
| Verdict |
Rice
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=1066 |
|
| Comments: 50 (Read/Post) Favorites: 1 (View) |
Submitted
on: 02-14-2002
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
1993 Honda Civic Si
2650 lbs without driver
(Full street trim with interior and glass windows)
547 hp to the wheels
11.58 @ 134 mph, Best ET to date
|
Showing page: 1 of 3
[ 1 2 3 ]
 |
| #4 |
2-14-2002 @ 08:29:51 PM |
| Posted By : CRXtrackguy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
hey, i'll give props to any civic with that much horsepower... i should be so lucky...
|
|
| #5 |
2-14-2002 @ 08:30:13 PM |
| Posted By : Mad Max |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Lose the graphics, but other than that it's pretty cool. I wouldn't buy it, but it's nice for what it is.
|
|
| #6 |
2-15-2002 @ 11:31:41 AM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Yeah, they better stop the show and get the rice out, so we can look at REAL cars.
|
|
| #7 |
2-15-2002 @ 04:06:42 PM |
| Posted By : Jesuz |
Reply | Edit | Del |
500 hp driving the front wheels is totally stupid
|
|
| #9 |
2-15-2002 @ 04:28:30 PM |
| Posted By : speedkills |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I saw a Civic at a car show here in Phoenix with 500hp. of course, the suspension was radically modified and it was converted to awd. I wouldn't mind driving THAT.
|
|
| #10 |
2-15-2002 @ 04:45:17 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Um...am I the only person here who thinks those specs should make the car faster than 11.58? He also shoulda left the car in stock trim...that would make one hell of a sleeper.
|
|
| #11 |
2-16-2002 @ 12:21:37 AM |
| Posted By : 500plus |
Reply | Edit | Del |
1) If it actually had anywhere near 547 hp it would NEVER hook up with tires that small.
2) There isn't a front wheel drive transaxle anywhere that can take 500+ horsepower except one from an Olds Toronado 455.
3) If a car this light actually had 547 horsepwer, it would be running faster than 11.58 assuming all the above issues would be taken care of.
What a bunch of bull!
It still isn't a bad looking car and I would not doubt that it's quick but 547 hp?????
Just exactly who are you trying to fool??
|
|
| #12 |
2-16-2002 @ 12:47:38 AM |
| Posted By : cams116 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
11.58 is crap. We got a little toyota over here 480hp and it does the same sort of times. and thats not on thoes big ass tyers.
|
|
| #13 |
2-16-2002 @ 01:07:42 AM |
| Posted By : CRXtrackguy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
500: 1) maybe he has different tires to use at the track
2) There are such things as aftermarket axles, since I assume you're referring to the axle itself rather than the transmission. Either way, there are heavy-duty race transmissions and axles available that can easily take the load. So relax.
|
|
| #14 |
3-03-2002 @ 10:45:08 PM |
| Posted By : pluto316 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I am always a fan of street legal drag cars. I'm just kooky like that.
|
|
| #15 |
3-03-2002 @ 11:05:49 PM |
| Posted By : dostoevsky |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I could be mistaken, but since when is 11.58 crap? Seriously, it takes lots of work to get a time like that (especially out of a civic).
|
|
| #16 |
3-23-2002 @ 02:56:37 AM |
| Posted By : cuda_man |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I have to agree that in a car that light 547HP at the wheels it should be faster than 11.58 even with limited traction.
|
|
| #17 |
3-23-2002 @ 04:35:26 AM |
| Posted By : CRacer25 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Anyone know what engine it's using?Also they made a civic SI from 1992-1995 in H/B form but it had a 1.6 Liter single cam engine.
|
|
| #18 |
3-29-2002 @ 05:34:32 PM |
| Posted By : Jon |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I cant believe he put down "glass windows"
|
|
| #19 |
3-29-2002 @ 05:45:09 PM |
| Posted By : Lebo |
Reply | Edit | Del |
well as opposed to lighter plastic windows like lexan. but you're right, he's still an idiot :P
|
Showing page: 1 of 3
[ 1 2 3 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
