Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 97661   By: Skid   Comment: "They're not the worst, but there are quite a few w..."
Car: 97661   By: DiRF   Comment: "They're like polished, oversized versions of what ..."
Car: 97661   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "those wheels are awful, especially on here...."
Car: 33317   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "Before the Ineos Grenadier, there was this. I reme..."
Car: 97492   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "To be fair, I never understood the hate. Every per..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

0 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password



This image has expired.

Final Stats:

Total Votes 667
Average Score 9.14
Verdict Rice



Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=13513
Submitted by: Gaddzook51
Comments: 218  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 3  (View)
Submitted on: 10-27-2002
View Stats Category: Car
Photoshops of this image:
17194,
Description:
1996 Chevrolet : Cavalier ...Ugly? YES!!


   Comments

Showing page: 7 of 11
[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ]

#121
10-28-2002 @ 09:05:35 AM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
Needs GTR and Type R badges just to complete the "I don't know what my car is" effect.

#122
10-28-2002 @ 09:07:15 AM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
#120, Yeah, it's nice when your car's top gear really IS an overdrive.

#123
10-28-2002 @ 09:09:56 AM
Posted By : mr_mcmunkee Reply | Edit | Del
Man. I just read this entire conversation and I'm all for not talking to this idiot when he's online. Can someone truthfully be SO ignorant? It seems like it has to be an act, but really...it doesn't appear it is!

#124
10-28-2002 @ 09:11:24 AM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
#123, You're just compensating for your non-Japanese car. :-P

#125
10-28-2002 @ 09:14:07 AM
Posted By : stang392 Reply | Edit | Del
i think we have found the Canadian version of ultra

#126
10-28-2002 @ 09:15:52 AM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
#125, It's not rice because it's fast!

Reflex action.


#127
10-28-2002 @ 10:03:22 AM
Posted By : kstagger Reply | Edit | Del
*sarcasm on* well - you know - hondas are the greatest cars ever! They run forever, never break down, and lots of people drive them - so they must be good. They have the highest technology factor, the best resale value of ANY car, and are good at drag racing, autoxing, off-roading, F1, Nascar, SCAA, British Tour Car, and street racing! *sarcasm off*

#128
10-28-2002 @ 10:04:50 AM
Posted By : mr_mcmunkee Reply | Edit | Del
I want to know where the wanker saw a 2000 Neon for $4000, and a 2000 Civic for $16,000.

Idiot.


#129
10-28-2002 @ 10:05:18 AM
Posted By : mr_mcmunkee Reply | Edit | Del
A new Civic doesn't even cost that much.

#130
10-28-2002 @ 10:07:15 AM
Posted By : mr_mcmunkee Reply | Edit | Del
#73, 92 Civic for $8000? Ok....suuuuuuuuure.

#131
10-28-2002 @ 10:09:35 AM
Posted By : comradesampo Reply | Edit | Del
#130, If you're dumb enough to want a Honda, you're dumb enough to pay three times too much for a previously-enjoyed Honda.

#132
10-28-2002 @ 10:10:30 AM
Posted By : mr_mcmunkee Reply | Edit | Del
I wouldn't use the word "enjoyed" and Honda in the same sentence.

#133
10-28-2002 @ 10:11:59 AM
Posted By : comradesampo Reply | Edit | Del
#132, Neither would I. That's just the current euphemism -- because "previously owned" is just so negative and feel-bad.

#134
10-28-2002 @ 10:14:59 AM
Posted By : mr_mcmunkee Reply | Edit | Del
Who cares about what the PC freaks say. I still call them "used" cars.

#135
10-28-2002 @ 10:18:13 AM
Posted By : Instance Reply | Edit | Del
blingbling, fellas. Blingbling.

Watch out for this one on the highway. (Spare parts might start falling off and hurt a real car.)


#136
10-28-2002 @ 10:23:37 AM
Posted By : mr_mcmunkee Reply | Edit | Del
Instance: "My 1995 Ford Mustang GT-R (cheaper version of the GT, not sure of all the
differences)"

You're a little mistaken.


#137
10-28-2002 @ 10:25:44 AM
Posted By : kstagger Reply | Edit | Del
should be GTS... it was a stripper GT.

#138
10-28-2002 @ 10:27:35 AM
Posted By : comradesampo Reply | Edit | Del
#134, Yeah, I do, too. I was just being, you know, ironic or something.

#139
10-28-2002 @ 11:34:24 AM
Posted By : solid_snake Reply | Edit | Del
#127, you used puncuation

#140
10-28-2002 @ 11:36:46 AM
Posted By : solid_snake Reply | Edit | Del
#137, they had the same motor as the GT with the base interior I belive

Showing page: 7 of 11
[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Friday, November 22, 2024 04:02:38 AM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.