|
|
|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
21 |
| Average Score |
2.52 |
| Verdict |
Good
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=7148 |
|
| Comments: 175 (Read/Post) Favorites: 2 (View) |
Submitted
on: 06-27-2002
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Off-topic |
|
|
Description:
I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG, OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND TO
THE REPUBLIC, FOR WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION, UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE,
WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.
Take that, Andrew Newdow, you prick. |
Showing page: 8 of 9
[ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ]
 |
| #142 |
6-27-2002 @ 04:23:19 PM |
| Posted By : Moose |
Reply | Edit | Del |
yes, that is it- the pledge was removed only because of those two words, if it didnt have those two words, it would be reinstated. So when the pledge is officially changed to not have those words, it will once again be legal in the states effected by this judgement
|
|
| #143 |
6-27-2002 @ 04:24:37 PM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Which is just CA for now...it will be reserved in the next few days I predict.
|
|
| #144 |
6-27-2002 @ 04:24:51 PM |
| Posted By : Jurrell |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Lets all sing to stop the hate:
Gator Boots, with the pimped out Gucci suit
Ain't got no job, but I stay sharp
Can't pay my rent, cause all my money's spent
but thats ok, cause im still fly
got a quarter tank gas in my new E-class
But that's alright cause i'm gon' ride
got everything in my moma's name
but im hood rich da dada dada da
|
|
| #145 |
6-27-2002 @ 04:25:01 PM |
| Posted By : Moose |
Reply | Edit | Del |
atheists dont consciously and purposefully organize, antitheists do
|
|
| #146 |
6-27-2002 @ 04:25:38 PM |
| Posted By : Moose |
Reply | Edit | Del |
no....its the 9 western states, the judgement was by the 9th district court
|
|
| #147 |
6-27-2002 @ 04:27:23 PM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Whether it's consious or not...imposing aetheism is the same as imposing Buddhism.
|
|
| #148 |
6-27-2002 @ 04:27:45 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
The thing is, there's no belief in atheism. It's a complete lack thereof. I don't organize with other atheists, but I intend to one day, and then it's only to protect the 1st Amendment, not to push some agenda.
Who imposes atheism? Who tells you that you can't believe in a god?
[Edited by Skid on 6-27-2002 @ 04:28:22 PM]
|
|
| #149 |
6-27-2002 @ 07:36:08 PM |
| Posted By : Moose |
Reply | Edit | Del |
ok, I'm back...was out with girlfriend
yea..there is nothing to impose on anybody, atheism is REALLY just a lack of any care for religion, so long as it isnt imposed on you, ABSOLUTE indifference to it.
antitheism is a threat to people of faiths, atheism is not
|
|
| #150 |
6-27-2002 @ 07:46:13 PM |
| Posted By : CRXtrackguy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I hate to get back into this argument, but Newdow didn't impose anything on anyone. He thought something was wrong, so he sued to try and get it fixed. A panel of federal judges agreed with him, thought that HE WAS RIGHT, and so declared the Pledge unconstitutional in its current state. You can't go blaming him, he's not the one that declared it unconstitutional. It was the federal government.
|
|
| #151 |
6-27-2002 @ 07:47:24 PM |
| Posted By : Moose |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I didnt think it was an argument, but rather a discussion, al-be-it a touchy subject
|
|
| #152 |
6-27-2002 @ 07:48:25 PM |
| Posted By : Moose |
Reply | Edit | Del |
and the court that decided was the 9th district court, which covers 9 western states...that means it is unconstitutional for all of the states in its jurisdiction
|
|
| #153 |
6-27-2002 @ 07:50:35 PM |
| Posted By : CRXtrackguy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I meant the pledge as it stands now is unconstitutional. If they were to simply take out the under god, it would be good and legal.
|
|
| #154 |
6-27-2002 @ 07:53:58 PM |
| Posted By : Moose |
Reply | Edit | Del |
yes, but the pledge would have to be OFFICIALLY changed
and that would mean everybody would have to change...I doubt the south will budge
[Edited by Moose on 6-27-2002 @ 07:54:37 PM]
|
|
| #155 |
6-27-2002 @ 08:58:41 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
On a similar note, the Supreme Court just ruled that school vouchers are constitutional. No doubt that was a knee-jerk reaction to the ruling on the Pledge....
|
|
| #156 |
6-28-2002 @ 09:49:46 AM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Not to start things again today...but the CA judge that made the decision has now placed the ruling "on hold" to re-evaluate the decision and most likely change his mind. That's rare for a judge to do that to his OWN decision, and even more rare for him/her to do it the day after! Since his ruling is under re-evaluation, the law cannot be enforced until a definate decision is met...so kids...keep pledging!
|
|
| #159 |
6-28-2002 @ 09:53:31 AM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Yeah...we were retards yesterday. I'll quote some smart dude, "Arguing over the internet is like running in the special olympics, even if you win, you are still retarded."
HAHA, I LOVE THAT QUOTE!
|
Showing page: 8 of 9
[ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
