|
|
|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=17763 |
|
| Comments: 214 (Read/Post) Favorites: 6 (View) |
Submitted
on: 01-23-2003
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
Ok, I'm taking a big risk here, because I KNOW you guys will see a little yellow and scream rice, but this was the Neon I traded in for my (completely stock) ZX2. I had a NICE sounding exhaust on it (no farting, nice deep tone), 15" rims with fat tires, a complete black tweed interior (done by myself and a friend) and a few minor performance parts, but I kept in mind...it's a Neon, not a racecar! |
Showing page: 9 of 11
[ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ]
 |
| #161 |
7-01-2003 @ 04:12:26 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
if it had the best parts from the factory then why does it have one of the largest aftermarkets out there?
|
|
| #162 |
7-01-2003 @ 04:12:30 PM |
| Posted By : solid_snake |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#159, no it doesn't have the "best of parts" and if you want to go fast doesn't it make sense to start with something decently fast anyway?
|
|
| #163 |
7-01-2003 @ 04:13:11 PM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
A factory Mustang has FAR from the "best" parts on it. It's faster because it has more displacement and more cylinders than a econobox, plain and simple. You have a LOT of room to improve a Mustang...and you can do that to a greater extent than a 4-banger.
|
|
| #164 |
7-01-2003 @ 04:14:44 PM |
| Posted By : Za |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I shouldn't have said that how I said it...
|
|
| #166 |
12-08-2003 @ 06:57:42 AM |
| Posted By : mr. poop |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#12, if you made them yourself why does it look like it says "gts" on them?
|
|
| #167 |
12-08-2003 @ 07:03:46 AM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
And more importantly, why did you put them on in the first place? :-P
|
|
| #168 |
12-08-2003 @ 07:10:05 AM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#159, Except for the 3.27 factory gearing ratio (or 2.73 on older models), under-sprung rear suspension that is prone to roll-up and bind, stock rear control arms with massive amounts of slop in their joints, a modified MacPherson strut front end with a highly questionable camber curve, a midbody that needs subframe connectors, rubbery factory shifter and somewhat imprecise clutch, and an engine invariably restricted by a combintation of emissions equipment and poor head flow (in the case of the V6 and GT models)...
|
|
| #169 |
1-06-2004 @ 04:04:38 PM |
| Posted By : thirtyseven |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Not a very conservative looking car. Where does he get off saying anything about other's cars?
|
|
| #170 |
1-06-2004 @ 04:07:55 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#117, "They're economy cars, not "performance" cars as the article leads on...and not quality ones at that.
I've been in a mid-'90s Civic sedan...the interior was of only slightly better quality to the 2000 Kia Sephia that my mother had.
|
|
| #171 |
2-07-2004 @ 02:18:29 AM |
| Posted By : MxCx |
Reply | Edit | Del |
You look kinda like Radioheads singer.
|
|
| #174 |
4-22-2004 @ 07:46:29 AM |
| Posted By : Biohazard |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I feel dumber after reading this thread. Ok, back to my homework with less brain cells and a McDonalds tune stuck in my head.
|
|
| #176 |
8-16-2004 @ 04:29:28 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I don't know, but I really didn't need to see him with his legs splayed like that. >_<
|
|
| #178 |
11-14-2004 @ 01:51:28 PM |
| Posted By : Tastycakemix |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Is that what that dude looked like? Man, he is creepy, with that joker smile and greasy black hair.
|
|
| #179 |
12-09-2004 @ 10:58:21 AM |
| Posted By : 91TSI |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Wow, Za was really dumb. He knew absolutely nothing.
|
|
| #180 |
5-01-2005 @ 11:36:21 AM |
| Posted By : 89Rettagt |
Reply | Edit | Del |
ah, i finally get to see mc munkees rice..er i mean ride. how is that NOT rice?
|
Showing page: 9 of 11
[ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
