Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 91522   By: Adambomb   Comment: "This brings back memories of warmer times...."
Car: Fpost   By: Adambomb   Comment: "http://www.hotrod.com/articles/1933-continental-co..."
Car: Fpost   By: DiRF   Comment: "Oddly appropriate, being surrounded by other Korea..."
Car: Fpost   By: Adambomb   Comment: "One of these too http://row52.com/Vehicle/Index/KL..."
Car: Fpost   By: Skid   Comment: "Holy shit, there's still one of these left? http:..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

0 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password


View this image at full size
Click here to let us know if the image above is broken.


Go back and vote on this image.

Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=33716
Submitted by: Skid
Comments: 1491  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 30  (View)
Submitted on: 07-01-2004
View Stats Category: Off-topic
Description:
Nobody's done it yet, so I will. Official Ricecop video thread. Post your automotive videos here (should this be vehicle misc?).


   Comments

Showing page: 39 of 75
[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 ]

#761
10-09-2005 @ 10:48:52 PM
Posted By : ambientFLIER Reply | Edit | Del
#759, why does it save it as an html file and how do i view it?

#762
10-09-2005 @ 10:55:12 PM
Posted By : thontor Reply | Edit | Del
Drift-Moore-Caddy...

right click and save as
http://www.firestorm98.com/videos/c...Moore-Caddy.wmv


#763
10-09-2005 @ 11:01:19 PM
Posted By : 427 Vette Reply | Edit | Del
#761, Did you click download now?

#764
10-09-2005 @ 11:09:59 PM
Posted By : ambientFLIER Reply | Edit | Del
#763, THERE IS NO PROBLEM !

#765
10-09-2005 @ 11:10:56 PM
Posted By : ambientFLIER Reply | Edit | Del
#762, cadillacs just suck now...they are all space-age and the cts-v sounds like a muscle car...wtf

#766
10-09-2005 @ 11:32:18 PM
Posted By : thontor Reply | Edit | Del
#765, space-age? i tend to think of the new styling as akin to a finely creased tuxedo

and the CTS-V is a muscle car.. a luxury muscle car.. heck it has the Corvette's LS2 under the hood

and in actuality it's not that loud.. obviously they've added an aftermarket exhaust or something to that drift car


#767
10-09-2005 @ 11:35:30 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
I prefer to simply think of the new Cadillac styling as ugly and garish. At least they've finally got a couple RWD models again, though.

#768
10-10-2005 @ 12:10:08 AM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
I figure Cadillac got tired of the stereotypical big slow car image, and what better way to fix that then by designing cars that look like arrowhead and putting Vette engines in them?
http://rds.yahoo.com/;_ylt=AqyjED0P...ad.php%3Ft%3D10


#769
10-10-2005 @ 12:18:53 AM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
I can understand trying to go for a more youthful image. I'm assuming that they're probably trying to target the younger yuppie sort of audience that is buying Audis and BMWs and such. Unfortunately, it appears that they've also adopted BMW's practice of having insane asylum escapees design their cars in the dark. I've almost gotten used to the CTS, but the rest of their lineup still strikes me as just...blech.

[Edited by Lemming on 10-10-2005 @ 12:19:32 AM]


#770
10-10-2005 @ 12:21:18 AM
Posted By : ambientFLIER Reply | Edit | Del
#766, say it out loud "cadillac muscle car"

#771
10-10-2005 @ 12:22:56 AM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
I giggled.

#772
10-10-2005 @ 12:27:18 AM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
I was, for lack of a better word, shocked by the CTS when it first appeared. I for one like it very much, but I'd still rather have an Audi A6. (who wouldn't) IMHO I think it's awesome that Cadillac has adopted a new fast paced image. I mean look at these specs:

2006 Cadillac CTS-V Performance & Efficiency Standard Features
- 5,665 cc 5.7 liters V 8 front engine with 99 mm bore, 92 mm stroke, 10.5 compression ratio, overhead valve and two valves per cylinder LS6
- Premium unleaded fuel 91
- Multi-point injection fuel system
- 16.9 gallon main premium unleaded fuel tank
- Power: 298 kW , 400 HP SAE @ 6,000 rpm; 395 ft lb , 536 Nm @ 4,800 rpm

If you told me in mid 2002 that Cadillac was putting out a car with these specs, I would've called you a liar and punched you in the throat!


#773
10-10-2005 @ 12:29:46 AM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
It's nice that they can do that now, but the downside is that they've sort of de-emphasized all the work they put into making the Northstar family of powerplants, which were supposed to be powerful and refined, with a smoother idle than the LS* engines (although, admittedly, the LS-family engines aren't rough).

#774
10-10-2005 @ 12:36:29 AM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
#773, I know what you're saying, fast specs or not Cadillac will never have the sports car image of the Chevy Corvette or the Dodge Viper, no matter how fast a quarter mile time the XLR-V might pull. Everytime you, me or anyone else hears the word Cadillac we think of big shiny land yacht rolling down the street, not a hyper tuned muscle machine tearing up the track. I like the styling and speed of the new Caddies, but if I'm gonna sit my ass down on leather and fire up an LS2, I'd rather be in a Vette.

#775
10-10-2005 @ 11:44:08 AM
Posted By : thontor Reply | Edit | Del
BMW and Mercedes both have insane performance machines.. luxury and performance.. there is certainly a market.. GM is just trying to break into that market dominated by the EuroLuxury

did i mention i love the new Caddy styling?


#776
10-10-2005 @ 12:31:02 PM
Posted By : MxCx Reply | Edit | Del
#775, thontor; Mr. Redundant.

#777
10-10-2005 @ 11:01:44 PM
Posted By : 427 Vette Reply | Edit | Del
Look at the last four videos, I believe both drivers came out unharmed.

http://www.nhra.com/2005/events/race21/video/index.html


#778
10-10-2005 @ 11:11:33 PM
Posted By : 427 Vette Reply | Edit | Del
#777, They were hurt it seems, bruises, cuts and a concussion.

#779
10-11-2005 @ 12:29:47 AM
Posted By : 427 Vette Reply | Edit | Del
'04 C5 versus a couple of SRT-4s.

http://x702.putfile.com/videos/28200491090.wmv

Same C5 vs RX-7.

http://x702.putfile.com/videos/28200550423.wmv

vs '04 Cobra.

http://x702.putfile.com/videos/28200423522.wmv


#780
10-11-2005 @ 12:44:18 AM
Posted By : 427 Vette Reply | Edit | Del
Volvo vs BMW head on.

http://media.damnfunnypictures.com/...eadon_smash.wmv

10 second Mustang is told not to run that fast.

http://www.amaterial.org/kcgeek/200...EA_14_2_131.wmv


Showing page: 39 of 75
[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Sunday, December 17, 2017 01:23:56 AM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright 2000 - 2017 Ricecop. All rights reserved.